142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29589769)
1. Comparison of portable handheld versus fixed isokinetic dynamometers in measuring strength of the wrist and forearm.
Lucado A; Fraher L; Patel H; Munck G
Physiother Theory Pract; 2019 Jul; 35(7):677-685. PubMed ID: 29589769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Forearm Torque and Lifting Strength: Normative Data.
Axelsson P; Fredrikson P; Nilsson A; Andersson JK; Kärrholm J
J Hand Surg Am; 2018 Jul; 43(7):677.e1-677.e17. PubMed ID: 29439817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New Methods to Assess Forearm Torque and Lifting Strength: Reliability and Validity.
Axelsson P; Kärrholm J
J Hand Surg Am; 2018 Sep; 43(9):865.e1-865.e10. PubMed ID: 29454600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reliability of a portable handheld dynamometer compared to a fixed isokinetic dynamometer to assess forearm torque strength.
Bonhof-Jansen EDJ; van Ham A; Kroon GJ; Winter RW; Brink SM
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2023 Apr; 42(2):147-153. PubMed ID: 36567012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test-Retest Reliability of Isokinetic Wrist Strength and Proprioception Measurements.
Seven B; Cobanoglu G; Oskay D; Atalay-Guzel N
J Sport Rehabil; 2019 Sep; 28(7):. PubMed ID: 30676238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Is there any correlation between the strength of pronation and supination of the dominant hand and that of the non-dominant one in right-handed healthy adults: preliminary results].
Rey PB; Jardin E; Uhring J; Obert L
Chir Main; 2014 Feb; 33(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 24411272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isokinetic profile of wrist and forearm strength in elite female junior tennis players.
Ellenbecker TS; Roetert EP; Riewald S
Br J Sports Med; 2006 May; 40(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 16632571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neck Strength Evaluated With Fixed and Portable Dynamometers in Asymptomatic Individuals: Correlation, Concurrent Validity, and Agreement.
Martins TS; Pinheiro-Araujo CF; Gorla C; Florencio LL; Martins J; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C; Oliveira AS; Bevilaqua-Grossi D
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2022 Sep; 45(7):543-550. PubMed ID: 36517269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic versus static grip strength: how grip strength changes when the wrist is moved, and why dynamic grip strength may be a more functional measurement.
LaStayo P; Hartzel J
J Hand Ther; 1999; 12(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 10459529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Jamar and Bodygrip Dynamometers for Handgrip Strength Measurement.
Guerra RS; Amaral TF; Sousa AS; Fonseca I; Pichel F; Restivo MT
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jul; 31(7):1931-1940. PubMed ID: 28640771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of wrist flexion and extension torques in different forearm positions.
Yoshii Y; Yuine H; Kazuki O; Tung WL; Ishii T
Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Dec; 14():115. PubMed ID: 26830913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination the validity of the new developed Sport Experts® hand grip dynamometer, measuring continuity of force, and comparison with current Takei and Baseline® dynamometers.
Güçlüöver A; Kutlu M; Ciğerci AE; Esen HT; Demirkan E; Erdoğdu M
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2015 Nov; 55(11):1318-21. PubMed ID: 25289714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength.
Rolsted SK; Andersen KD; Dandanell G; Dall CH; Zilmer CK; Bülow K; Kristensen MT
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2024 Jun; 43(3):101692. PubMed ID: 38705572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wrist flexion and extension torques measured by highly sensitive dynamometer in healthy subjects from 5 to 80 years.
Decostre V; Canal A; Ollivier G; Ledoux I; Moraux A; Doppler V; Payan CA; Hogrel JY
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jan; 16(1):4. PubMed ID: 25636264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of muscle weakness based on different diagnostic criteria in community-dwelling older adults: A comparison of grip strength dynamometers.
Kim M; Shinkai S
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Nov; 17(11):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 28517036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New assessment of forearm strength: reliability and validity.
Wong CK; Moskovitz N
Am J Occup Ther; 2010; 64(5):809-13. PubMed ID: 21073112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three hand dynamometers in relation to the accuracy and precision of the measurements.
Amaral JF; Mancini M; Novo Júnior JM
Rev Bras Fisioter; 2012 Jun; 16(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 22801514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and Validity of the Belt-Stabilized Handheld Dynamometer in Hip- and Knee-Strength Tests.
Martins J; da Silva JR; da Silva MRB; Bevilaqua-Grossi D
J Athl Train; 2017 Sep; 52(9):809-819. PubMed ID: 28787180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance Demands in Softball Pitching: A Comprehensive Muscle Fatigue Study.
Corben JS; Cerrone SA; Soviero JE; Kwiecien SY; Nicholas SJ; McHugh MP
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):2035-41. PubMed ID: 26109610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength.
Mathiowetz V
Occup Ther Int; 2002; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 12374997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
