These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29589791)

  • 1. Evidence for selective adjustments of inhibitory control in a variant of the stop signal task.
    Xu KZ; Mayse JD; Courtney S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):818-831. PubMed ID: 29589791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A "gap effect" on stop signal reaction times in a human saccadic countermanding task.
    Stevenson SA; Elsley JK; Corneil BD
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 101(2):580-90. PubMed ID: 19019975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A dual but asymmetric role of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in response inhibition and switching from a non-salient to salient action.
    Manza P; Hu S; Chao HH; Zhang S; Leung HC; Li CR
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():466-474. PubMed ID: 27126003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 27832599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balancing cognitive demands: control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Bissett PG; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):392-404. PubMed ID: 21171806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task.
    Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Hirose S; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 29(50):15870-7. PubMed ID: 20016103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing of global and selective stop signals: application of Donders' subtraction method to stop-signal task performance.
    van de Laar MC; van den Wildenberg WP; van Boxtel GJ; van der Molen MW
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 20178958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Right Superior Frontal Gyrus and Individual Variation in Proactive Control of Impulsive Response.
    Hu S; Ide JS; Zhang S; Li CR
    J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(50):12688-12696. PubMed ID: 27974616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time.
    Zhang S; Tsai SJ; Hu S; Xu J; Chao HH; Calhoun VD; Li CS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3289-302. PubMed ID: 26089095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Countermanding eye-head gaze shifts in humans: marching orders are delivered to the head first.
    Corneil BD; Elsley JK
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):883-95. PubMed ID: 15728762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating a race model account of executive control in rats with the countermanding paradigm.
    Beuk J; Beninger RJ; Paré M
    Neuroscience; 2014 Mar; 263():96-110. PubMed ID: 24440749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity.
    Portugal ACA; Afonso AS; Caldas AL; Maturana W; Mocaiber I; Machado-Pinheiro W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():234-243. PubMed ID: 30343096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contextual response time adaptation in the countermanding performance of rats.
    Beuk J; Beninger RJ; Mechefske E; Paré M
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():200-217. PubMed ID: 27646289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-stop-signal adjustments: inhibition improves subsequent inhibition.
    Bissett PG; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):955-66. PubMed ID: 22268912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response inhibition of children with ADHD in the stop-signal task: an event-related potential study.
    Senderecka M; Grabowska A; Szewczyk J; Gerc K; Chmylak R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 21641941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP components associated with an indirect emotional stop signal task in healthy and depressed participants.
    Camfield DA; Burton TK; De Blasio FM; Barry RJ; Croft RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Feb; 124():12-25. PubMed ID: 29278691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A differential impact of action-effect temporal contiguity on different measures of response inhibition in the Go\No-Go and Stop-signal paradigms.
    Karsh N; Soker-Mijalevich E; Horovitz O
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1157-1168. PubMed ID: 38453736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflict anticipation in alcohol dependence - A model-based fMRI study of stop signal task.
    Hu S; Ide JS; Zhang S; Sinha R; Li CS
    Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 8():39-50. PubMed ID: 26106526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of variability of sequence length of go trials preceding a stop trial on ability of response inhibition in stop-signal task.
    Hiraoka K; Kinoshita A; Kunimura H; Matsuoka M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29848189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.