213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29590589)
21. Sequence-Based Prediction of Fuzzy Protein Interactions.
Miskei M; Horvath A; Vendruscolo M; Fuxreiter M
J Mol Biol; 2020 Mar; 432(7):2289-2303. PubMed ID: 32112804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Disordered Cellular Multi-Tasker WIP and Its Protein-Protein Interactions: A Structural View.
Sokolik CG; Qassem N; Chill JH
Biomolecules; 2020 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 32708183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Complete Coupled Binding-Folding Pathway of the Intrinsically Disordered Transcription Factor Protein Brinker Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Markov State Modeling.
Collins AP; Anderson PC
Biochemistry; 2018 Jul; 57(30):4404-4420. PubMed ID: 29990433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contribution of proline to the pre-structuring tendency of transient helical secondary structure elements in intrinsically disordered proteins.
Lee C; Kalmar L; Xue B; Tompa P; Daughdrill GW; Uversky VN; Han KH
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 Mar; 1840(3):993-1003. PubMed ID: 24211251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Conformational recognition of an intrinsically disordered protein.
Krieger JM; Fusco G; Lewitzky M; Simister PC; Marchant J; Camilloni C; Feller SM; De Simone A
Biophys J; 2014 Apr; 106(8):1771-9. PubMed ID: 24739176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Dogan J; Gianni S; Jemth P
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Apr; 16(14):6323-31. PubMed ID: 24317797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Entropy Hotspots for the Binding of Intrinsically Disordered Ligands to a Receptor Domain.
Shi J; Shen Q; Cho JH; Hwang W
Biophys J; 2020 May; 118(10):2502-2512. PubMed ID: 32311315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A J-modulated protonless NMR experiment characterizes the conformational ensemble of the intrinsically disordered protein WIP.
Rozentur-Shkop E; Goobes G; Chill JH
J Biomol NMR; 2016 Dec; 66(4):243-257. PubMed ID: 27844185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intrinsically disordered proteins: modes of binding with emphasis on disordered domains.
Morris OM; Torpey JH; Isaacson RL
Open Biol; 2021 Oct; 11(10):210222. PubMed ID: 34610267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of electrostatic forces on the association kinetics and conformational ensemble of an intrinsically disordered protein.
Cook EC; Creamer TP
Proteins; 2020 Dec; 88(12):1607-1619. PubMed ID: 32654182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Thermodynamic Basis of the Fuzzy Interaction of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein.
Hadži S; Mernik A; Podlipnik Č; Loris R; Lah J
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2017 Nov; 56(46):14494-14497. PubMed ID: 28914483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modulation of Correlated Segment Fluctuations in IDPs upon Complex Formation as an Allosteric Regulatory Mechanism.
Beier A; Schwarz TC; Kurzbach D; Platzer G; Tribuzio F; Konrat R
J Mol Biol; 2018 Aug; 430(16):2439-2452. PubMed ID: 29733855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Test and Evaluation of ff99IDPs Force Field for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Ye W; Ji D; Wang W; Luo R; Chen HF
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 May; 55(5):1021-9. PubMed ID: 25919886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Deducing the functional characteristics of the human selenoprotein SELK from the structural properties of its intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain.
Polo A; Colonna G; Guariniello S; Ciliberto G; Costantini S
Mol Biosyst; 2016 Mar; 12(3):758-72. PubMed ID: 26735936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diffusion-limited association of disordered protein by non-native electrostatic interactions.
Kim JY; Meng F; Yoo J; Chung HS
Nat Commun; 2018 Nov; 9(1):4707. PubMed ID: 30413699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Insight into Calcium-Binding Motifs of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Newcombe EA; Fernandes CB; Lundsgaard JE; Brakti I; Lindorff-Larsen K; Langkilde AE; Skriver K; Kragelund BB
Biomolecules; 2021 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34439840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long range recognition and selection in IDPs: the interactions of the C-terminus of p53.
Kannan S; Lane DP; Verma CS
Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():23750. PubMed ID: 27030593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mechanism-Dependent Modulation of Ultrafast Interfacial Water Dynamics in Intrinsically Disordered Protein Complexes.
Chowdhury A; Kovalenko SA; Aramburu IV; Tan PS; Ernsting NP; Lemke EA
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2019 Mar; 58(14):4720-4724. PubMed ID: 30703278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Conserved Helix-Flanking Prolines Modulate Intrinsically Disordered Protein:Target Affinity by Altering the Lifetime of the Bound Complex.
Crabtree MD; Borcherds W; Poosapati A; Shammas SL; Daughdrill GW; Clarke J
Biochemistry; 2017 May; 56(18):2379-2384. PubMed ID: 28425697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain of galectin-3 dynamically mediates multisite self-association of the protein through fuzzy interactions.
Lin YH; Qiu DC; Chang WH; Yeh YQ; Jeng US; Liu FT; Huang JR
J Biol Chem; 2017 Oct; 292(43):17845-17856. PubMed ID: 28893908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
