156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29594168)
1. Feasibility and Usefulness of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder (Soloassist) in Laparoscopic Surgery.
Ohmura Y; Nakagawa M; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A
Visc Med; 2018 Feb; 34(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 29594168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.
Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A
Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2206-2216. PubMed ID: 30334160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with a joystick-guided robotic scope holder (Soloassist II®): retrospective comparative study with human assistant.
Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2019 Jun; 404(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 31129765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study.
Gillen S; Pletzer B; Heiligensetzer A; Wolf P; Kleeff J; Feussner H; Fürst A
Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):164-70. PubMed ID: 23990155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application and advantages of a joystick-controlled robotic scope holder in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a comparative study.
Wang SH; Hsieh TH; Chao WP; Lo TY; Huang TS; Chen YH
Updates Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38468019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Camera Assistance and Its Benefit in 1033 Traditional Laparoscopic Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-guided Camera Holder.
Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Fritz M; Djalali P; Birk D
Surg Technol Int; 2014 Nov; 25():19-23. PubMed ID: 25419950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery Using a Joystick-Guided Endoscope Holder (Soloassist II) or a Human Assistant.
Kim JS; Park WC; Lee JH
Ann Coloproctol; 2019 Aug; 35(4):181-186. PubMed ID: 31487765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder Compared to That of Human Scopists: A Prospective Trial.
Kudo T; Kanaji S; Harada H; Ohmura Y; Sawada R; Urakawa N; Goto H; Hasegawa H; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Kakeji Y
Surg Innov; 2023 Oct; 30(5):564-570. PubMed ID: 36788211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transoral endoscopic thyroid surgery using robotic scope holder: Our initial experiences.
Park JO; Kim MR; Park YJ; Kim MS; Sun DI
J Minim Access Surg; 2020; 16(3):235-238. PubMed ID: 31031326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of Robotic Camera Assistance in Minimally Invasive Bariatric Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-Guided Camera-Holder.
Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Hess S; Merscher A; Glanemann M; Birk D
Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():87-92. PubMed ID: 30888669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy].
Langer D; Pudil J; Ryska M
Rozhl Chir; 2006 Sep; 85(9):450-4. PubMed ID: 17323769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Case-Control Outcome Analysis and Surgical Resident Training Implications.
Ghanem M; Shaheen S; Blebea J; Tuma F; Zayout M; Conti N; Qudah G; Kamel MK
Cureus; 2020 Apr; 12(4):e7641. PubMed ID: 32399373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.
Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P
J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of human and robotic camera control in laparoscopic biliary and colon surgery.
Proske JM; Dagher I; Franco D
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2004 Dec; 14(6):345-8. PubMed ID: 15684779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as solo surgery with the aid of a robotic camera holder: a case-control study.
Kalteis M; Pistrich R; Schimetta W; Pölz W
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Aug; 17(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 17710048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder.
Merola S; Weber P; Wasielewski A; Ballantyne GH
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12008762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder Economically Viable? A Cost Comparison of Surgical Assistant Versus the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder in Laparoscopic Liver Resections.
Stott MC; Barrie J; Sebastien D; Hammill C; Subar DA
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Oct; 27(5):375-378. PubMed ID: 28727633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.
Odermatt M; Ahmed J; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 28271267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
