These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

564 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29594349)

  • 1. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Veloso SRM; Lemos CAA; de Moraes SLD; do Egito Vasconcelos BC; Pellizzer EP; de Melo Monteiro GQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jan; 23(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 29594349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do bulk-fill resins decrease the restorative time in posterior teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
    Bellinaso MD; Soares FZM; Rocha RO
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Nov; 10(4):e12463. PubMed ID: 31560449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis of the clinical behavior of posterior direct resin restorations: Low polymerization shrinkage resin in comparison to methacrylate composite resin.
    Kruly PC; Giannini M; Pascotto RC; Tokubo LM; Suga USG; Marques ACR; Terada RSS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191942. PubMed ID: 29466366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.
    Heintze SD; Loguercio AD; Hanzen TA; Reis A; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e109-e135. PubMed ID: 35221127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
    Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of flowable composites on the clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Szesz A; Parreiras S; Martini E; Reis A; Loguercio A
    J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():11-21. PubMed ID: 28729119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the clinical performance of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth similar if restored with incremental or bulk-filling techniques? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kunz PVM; Wambier LM; Kaizer MDR; Correr GM; Reis A; Gonzaga CC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2281-2297. PubMed ID: 35031879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.
    Endo Hoshino IA; Fraga Briso AL; Bueno Esteves LM; Dos Santos PH; Meira Borghi Frascino S; Fagundes TC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5697-5710. PubMed ID: 35556174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longevity of bulk fill and ormocer composites in permanent posterior teeth: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Abreu NM; Sousa FB; Dantas RV; Leite PK; Batista AU; Montenegro RV
    Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 35506964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
    Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
    Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
    Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-year Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial of Class II Restorations Using Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composites.
    Moda MD; Briso AF; Hoshino I; Frascino S; Santos PH; Gonçalves DM; Fagundes TC
    Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):516-528. PubMed ID: 34520538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    da Veiga AM; Cunha AC; Ferreira DM; da Silva Fidalgo TK; Chianca TK; Reis KR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():1-12. PubMed ID: 27523636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bulk fill restoratives: to cap or not to cap--that is the question?
    Tomaszewska IM; Kearns JO; Ilie N; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2015 Mar; 43(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 25625673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation.
    van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2017 Aug; 125(4):303-309. PubMed ID: 28524243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.