These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29594999)

  • 1. [Comparative study on the shade matching performance of dental students under D55 and D65 light sources conditions].
    Yiqing X; Gang L; Yunhong L; Zhiyun C; Yanan W; Wei L
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 36(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 29594999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference in illuminant-dependent color changes of shade guide tabs by the shade designation relative to three illuminants.
    Cha HS; Lee YK
    Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 20178211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Dental Shade Guides and Experience on the Accuracy of Shade Matching.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Amirinejad S; Alavi S; Rajatihaghi H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 27084858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance assessment of dental shade guides.
    Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e15-20. PubMed ID: 19329240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.
    Gokce HS; Piskin B; Ceyhan D; Gokce SM; Arisan V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 20188236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of shade matching performance of dental students under natural daylight and daylight lamp conditions.
    Mete JJ; Dange SP; Khalikar AN; Vaidya SP
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2013; 8(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 23712340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vitapan 3D-master shade guide showed no fluorescence emission.
    Lee YK; Yu B; Lim HN
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):742-6. PubMed ID: 23649056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New shade guide for evaluation of tooth whitening--colorimetric study.
    Paravina RD; Johnston WM; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):276-83; discussion 283. PubMed ID: 17877628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel sample design for determining color compatibility between layered resin composite and vita shade guides.
    Ismail EH; Dawson DV; Maia RR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jan; 32(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 31565829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of the color difference between teeth underwent cold light whitening and two kinds of shade guides].
    Xu YX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Jun; 50(3):543-546. PubMed ID: 29930427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design.
    Paravina RD; Majkic G; Imai FH; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 17451478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs.
    Kim JG; Yu B; Lee YK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of an educational method to improve the shade-matching ability of dental students.
    Chakrabortty K; Wadkar A; Mustaffa HG; Gupta C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):815.e1-815.e9. PubMed ID: 33678442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices.
    Tsiliagkou A; Diamantopoulou S; Papazoglou E; Kakaboura A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 26835527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of factors affecting dental shade matching in first-year dental students.
    Imbery TA; Killough C; Baechle MA; Hankle JL; Janus C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 33637325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.