BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29595291)

  • 1. Method biases in single-source personality assessments.
    McCrae RR
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1160-1173. PubMed ID: 29595291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source method biases as implicit personality theory at the domain and facet levels.
    McCrae RR; Mõttus R; Hřebíčková M; Realo A; Allik J
    J Pers; 2019 Aug; 87(4):813-826. PubMed ID: 30244473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrepancies in self- and informant-reports of personality pathology: Examining the DSM-5 Section III trait model.
    Carnovale M; Carlson EN; Quilty LC; Bagby RM
    Personal Disord; 2019 Sep; 10(5):456-467. PubMed ID: 31259602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The discriminant (and convergent) validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.
    Crego C; Gore WL; Rojas SL; Widiger TA
    Personal Disord; 2015 Oct; 6(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 25894855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response bias and the personality inventory for DSM-5: Contrasting self- and informant-report.
    Quilty LC; Cosentino N; Bagby RM
    Personal Disord; 2018 Jul; 9(4):346-353. PubMed ID: 28368145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement invariance of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex.
    Suzuki T; South SC; Samuel DB; Wright AGC; Yalch MM; Hopwood CJ; Thomas KM
    Personal Disord; 2019 Mar; 10(2):114-122. PubMed ID: 29952589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric inpatients.
    Lugo V; de Oliveira SES; Hessel CR; Monteiro RT; Pasche NL; Pavan G; Motta LS; Pacheco MA; Spanemberg L
    Personal Ment Health; 2019 Feb; 13(1):24-39. PubMed ID: 30353698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Family Study of the
    Katz AC; Hee D; Hooker CI; Shankman SA
    J Pers Disord; 2018 Dec; 32(6):753-765. PubMed ID: 28972815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short form of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire: Its trait and facet relationships with personality disorder functioning styles in Chinese general and clinical samples.
    Fan H; Wang C; Shao X; Jia Y; Aluja A; Wang W
    Psychiatry Res; 2019 Jan; 271():438-445. PubMed ID: 30537666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DSM-5 Assessments of the Level of Personality Functioning: Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Functioning.
    Beheydt L; Schrijvers D; Sabbe B; Jansen B; De Grave C; Luyten P
    Psychiatry; 2020; 83(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 31560604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the usefulness of measures of normal personality for clinical assessment: evidence of the incremental validity of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.
    Quirk SW; Christiansen ND; Wagner SH; McNulty JL
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):311-25. PubMed ID: 14593831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuity between interview-rated personality disorders and self-reported DSM-5 traits in a Danish psychiatric sample.
    Bach B; Anderson J; Simonsen E
    Personal Disord; 2017 Jul; 8(3):261-267. PubMed ID: 26784892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the dependability and associations with functioning of the DSM-5 Section III trait model of personality pathology and the DSM-5 Section II personality disorder model.
    Chmielewski M; Ruggero CJ; Kotov R; Liu K; Krueger RF
    Personal Disord; 2017 Jul; 8(3):228-236. PubMed ID: 27618342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Validity and Clinical Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Response Inconsistency Scale.
    Bagby RM; Sellbom M
    J Pers Assess; 2018; 100(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 29432027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders.
    Perry JC
    Am J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 149(12):1645-53. PubMed ID: 1443240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of Big Four personality scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality--Second Edition (SNAP-2).
    Calabrese WR; Rudick MM; Simms LJ; Clark LA
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Sep; 24(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 22250598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of maladaptive variants of Five-Factor Model traits.
    Lynam DR
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1593-614. PubMed ID: 22321444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A meta-analysis of the five-factor internal structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.
    Watters CA; Bagby RM
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1255-1260. PubMed ID: 29952594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The valid assessment of personality disorders.
    Skodol AE; Hyler SE; Oldham JM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Dec; 150(12):1905-6. PubMed ID: 8305045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing relationships between DSM-5 Section III maladaptive traits and measures of self and interpersonal impairment in Italian community dwelling adults.
    Fossati A; Borroni S; Somma A; Markon KE; Krueger RF
    Personal Disord; 2017 Jul; 8(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 27280930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.