BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29595751)

  • 1. How does information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening alter the intention to be screened?: a randomized survey of Norwegian women.
    Iyer AL; Bundorf MK; Gyrd-Hansen D; Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Cyr PR; Sønbø Kristiansen I
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 28(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29595751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Providing more balanced information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening: A randomized survey among US and Norwegian women.
    Cyr PR; Pedersen K; Iyer AL; Bundorf MK; Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Gyrd-Hansen D; Kristiansen IS; Burger EA
    Prev Med Rep; 2021 Sep; 23():101452. PubMed ID: 34221852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the primary screening test influence women's anxiety and intention to screen for cervical cancer? A randomized survey of Norwegian women.
    Burger EA; Nygård M; Gyrd-Hansen D; Moger TA; Kristiansen IS
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Apr; 14():360. PubMed ID: 24735469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study.
    Hestbech MS; Gyrd-Hansen D; Kragstrup J; Siersma V; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2016 Dec; 34(4):401-419. PubMed ID: 27845597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of the 'cancer effect' on young women's responses to overdiagnosis in cervical screening.
    Phillips K; Hersch J; Turner R; Jansen J; McCaffery K
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Oct; 99(10):1568-75. PubMed ID: 27133918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial.
    Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Martínez-Alonso M; Garcia M; Sala M; Perestelo-Pérez L; Vidal C; Codern-Bové N; Feijoo-Cid M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Cardona À; Pons A; Carles-Lavila M; Rue M;
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214057. PubMed ID: 30913217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference?
    Nekhlyudov L; Li R; Fletcher SW
    Health Expect; 2008 Dec; 11(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 19076664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and field testing of a tool to elicit women's preferences among cervical cancer screening modalities.
    Wood B; Taljaard M; El-Khatib Z; McFaul S; Graham ID; Little J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):1169-1181. PubMed ID: 31423705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Community-Based Health Education has Positive Influence on the Attitude to Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Rural Nepal.
    Shakya S; Karmacharya BM; Afset JE; Bofin A; Åsvold BO; Syversen U; Tingulstad S
    J Cancer Educ; 2016 Sep; 31(3):547-53. PubMed ID: 26031906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of cervical cancer screening intention of HIV-positive women in the central region of Ghana.
    Ebu NI; Ogah JK
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 Feb; 18(1):43. PubMed ID: 29482523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of an Intervention in General Practice to Increase the Participation of Immigrants in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Møen KA; Kumar B; Igland J; Diaz E
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e201903. PubMed ID: 32236530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's knowledge of and attitudes toward cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening in Zanzibar, Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.
    Weng Q; Jiang J; Haji FM; Nondo LH; Zhou H
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Jan; 20(1):63. PubMed ID: 31992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychographic predictors of intention to use cervical cancer screening services among women attending maternal and child health services in Southern Ethiopia: the theory of planned behavior (TPB) perspective.
    Abamecha F; Tena A; Kiros G
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):434. PubMed ID: 31023306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with decisions to attend cervical cancer screening among women aged 30-60 years in Chatapadung Contracting Medical Unit, Thailand.
    Budkaew J; Chumworathayi B
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(12):4903-7. PubMed ID: 24998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical Cancer Screening among Women Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited Environment.
    New-Aaron M; Meza JL; Goedert MH; Kibusi SM; Mkhoi ML; Mayengo CD; Charles J; Shabani S; Musil KM; Cheney A; Sumba S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 21(7):2035-2045. PubMed ID: 32711430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. women's perceived importance of the harms and benefits of mammograms and associations with screening ambivalence: Results from a national survey.
    Qin X; Nagler RH; Fowler EF; Gollust SE
    Prev Med; 2019 Jun; 123():130-137. PubMed ID: 30890352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What Australian women want and when they want it: cervical screening testing preferences, decision-making styles and information needs.
    Dieng M; Trevena L; Turner RM; Wadolowski M; McCaffery K
    Health Expect; 2013 Jun; 16(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 21726363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining behavioral intention and its predictors towards cervical cancer screening among women in Gomma district, Jimma, Ethiopia: Application of the theory of planned behavior.
    Wollancho W; Amdissa D; Bamboro S; Wasihun Y; Tareke KG; Gizaw AT
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0238472. PubMed ID: 33151928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial.
    Hersch J; McGeechan K; Barratt A; Jansen J; Irwig L; Jacklyn G; Houssami N; Dhillon H; McCaffery K
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e016246. PubMed ID: 28988168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women's perception, attitudes, and intended behavior towards predictive epigenetic risk testing for female cancers in 5 European countries: a cross-sectional online survey.
    Wegwarth O; Pashayan N; Widschwendter M; Rebitschek FG
    BMC Public Health; 2019 May; 19(1):667. PubMed ID: 31146730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.