BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29596591)

  • 1. Using electronic maternity records to estimate female genital mutilation in Lothian from 2010 to 2013.
    Ford CM; Darlow K; Massie A; Gorman DR
    Eur J Public Health; 2018 Aug; 28(4):657-661. PubMed ID: 29596591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland.
    Van Baelen L; Ortensi L; Leye E
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Dec; 21(6):474-482. PubMed ID: 27652839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model.
    Kawous R; van den Muijsenbergh METC; Geraci D; Hendriks KRM; Ortensi LE; Hilverda F; Burdorf A
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):1033. PubMed ID: 32600380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the magnitude of female genital mutilation/cutting in Norway: an extrapolation model.
    Ziyada MM; Norberg-Schulz M; Johansen REB
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Feb; 16():110. PubMed ID: 26837303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis.
    De Schrijver L; Van Baelen L; Van Eekert N; Leye E
    Reprod Health; 2020 Jul; 17(1):105. PubMed ID: 32641062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the number of foreign women with female genital mutilation/cutting in Italy.
    Farina P; Ortensi LE; Menonna A
    Eur J Public Health; 2016 Aug; 26(4):656-61. PubMed ID: 27006376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: Updated Estimates of Women and Girls at Risk, 2012.
    Goldberg H; Stupp P; Okoroh E; Besera G; Goodman D; Danel I
    Public Health Rep; 2016; 131(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26957669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female genital mutilation: Obstetric outcomes in metropolitan Sydney.
    Davis G; Jellins J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Apr; 59(2):312-316. PubMed ID: 30734267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping the lack of public initiative against female genital mutilation in Denmark.
    Christoffersen GM; Bruhn PJ; de Neergaard R; Engel S; Naeser V
    Reprod Health; 2018 Apr; 15(1):59. PubMed ID: 29625619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of primary healthcare professionals to female genital mutilation in Valencia, Spain: are we ready for this challenge?
    González-Timoneda A; Ruiz Ros V; González-Timoneda M; Cano Sánchez A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jul; 18(1):579. PubMed ID: 30041654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The experience of maternity care for migrant women living with female genital mutilation: A qualitative synthesis.
    Scamell M; Ghumman A
    Birth; 2019 Mar; 46(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 30294872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changing prevalence and factors associated with female genital mutilation in Ethiopia: Data from the 2000, 2005 and 2016 national demographic health surveys.
    Azeze GA; Williams A; Tweya H; Obsa MS; Mokonnon TM; Kanche ZZ; Fite RO; Harries AD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238495. PubMed ID: 32881931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The lower prevalence of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands: a nationwide study in Dutch midwifery practices.
    Korfker DG; Reis R; Rijnders ME; Meijer-van Asperen S; Read L; Sanjuan M; Herschderfer K; Buitendijk SE
    Int J Public Health; 2012 Apr; 57(2):413-20. PubMed ID: 22314540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female genital mutilation/cutting in Italy: an enhanced estimation for first generation migrant women based on 2016 survey data.
    Ortensi LE; Farina P; Leye E
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Jan; 18(1):129. PubMed ID: 29329573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the number of women with female genital mutilation in Belgium.
    Dubourg D; Richard F; Leye E; Ndame S; Rommens T; Maes S
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2011 Aug; 16(4):248-57. PubMed ID: 21561227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006-2012: a descriptive study.
    Varol N; Dawson A; Turkmani S; Hall JJ; Nanayakkara S; Jenkins G; Homer CS; McGeechan K
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Oct; 16(1):328. PubMed ID: 27793119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female genital mutilation/cutting incidence, diagnostic capacities, and obstetric outcomes among migrant women: a single-center retrospective analysis in a 10-year birth cohort in Austria.
    Taumberger N; Gruber T; Edler K; Trutnovsky G; Bracic T; Semrl N; Schütz AM; Eisnecker K; Tamussino K; Fluhr H
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Jan; 23(1):68. PubMed ID: 36627618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Female genital mutilation among antenatal care and contraceptive advice attendees in Sweden.
    Litorp H; Franck M; Almroth L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(7):716-22. PubMed ID: 18607822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in 27 African countries and Yemen.
    Yoder PS; Wang S; Johansen E
    Stud Fam Plann; 2013 Jun; 44(2):189-204. PubMed ID: 23720002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the prevalence of female genital mutilation in Portugal.
    Teixeira AL; Lisboa M
    Public Health; 2016 Oct; 139():53-60. PubMed ID: 27267250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.