These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29597142)

  • 1. Programmable prostate palpation simulator using property-changing pneumatic bladder.
    Talhan A; Jeon S
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():166-177. PubMed ID: 29597142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Palpation simulator with stable haptic feedback.
    Kim SY; Ryu JH; Lee W
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015; 24(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 25539890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic Levitation Haptic Augmentation for Virtual Tissue Stiffness Perception.
    Tong Q; Yuan Z; Liao X; Zheng M; Yuan T; Zhao J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Dec; 24(12):3123-3136. PubMed ID: 29990159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using visual cues to enhance haptic feedback for palpation on virtual model of soft tissue.
    Li M; Konstantinova J; Secco EL; Jiang A; Liu H; Nanayakkara T; Seneviratne LD; Dasgupta P; Althoefer K; Wurdemann HA
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Nov; 53(11):1177-86. PubMed ID: 26018755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual reality-based training for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Burdea G; Patounakis G; Popescu V; Weiss RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Oct; 46(10):1253-60. PubMed ID: 10513131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Haptic palpation for medical simulation in virtual environments.
    Ullrich S; Kuhlen T
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):617-25. PubMed ID: 22402689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liver pathology simulation: algorithm for haptic rendering and force maps for palpation assessment.
    Hamza-Lup FG; Seitan A; Popovici DM; Bogdan CM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 184():175-81. PubMed ID: 23400152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Principal considerations for the contemporary high-fidelity endovascular simulator design used in training and evaluation.
    Eslahpazir BA; Goldstone J; Allemang MT; Wang JC; Kashyap VS
    J Vasc Surg; 2014 Apr; 59(4):1154-62. PubMed ID: 24418640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FEM-based interaction model between elastic objects for indirect palpation simulator.
    Kuroda Y; Nakao M; Kuroda T; Oyama H; Komori M; Matsuda T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 98():183-9. PubMed ID: 15544268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A portable palpation training platform with virtual human patient.
    Niles T; Lind DS; Johnsen K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():408-14. PubMed ID: 21335830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception-based 3D tactile rendering from a single image for human skin examinations by dynamic touch.
    Kim K; Lee S
    Skin Res Technol; 2015 May; 21(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 25087469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abdominal Palpation Haptic Device for Colonoscopy Simulation Using Pneumatic Control.
    Cheng M; Marinovic W; Watson M; Ourselin S; Passenger J; De Visser H; Salvado O; Riek S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2012; 5(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 26964066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial palpation in robotic surgery using haptic feedback.
    Abiri A; Juo YY; Tao A; Askari SJ; Pensa J; Bisley JW; Dutson EP; Grundfest WS
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1252-1259. PubMed ID: 30187198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Haptic augmented skin surface generation toward telepalpation from a mobile skin image.
    Kim K
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 May; 24(2):203-212. PubMed ID: 29067717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Haptic tumor augmentation: exploring multi-point interaction.
    Jeon S; Harders M
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2014; 7(4):477-85. PubMed ID: 25532149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
    Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
    World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the Effect of Haptic Factors for Vascular Palpation Skill Assessment Using an Affordable Simulator.
    Liu Z; Bible J; Wells J; Vadivalagan D; Singapogu R
    IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol; 2020; 1():228-234. PubMed ID: 33681817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of stiffness feedback for hard nodule identification on a phantom silicone model.
    Li M; Konstantinova J; Xu G; He B; Aminzadeh V; Xie J; Wurdemann H; Althoefer K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172703. PubMed ID: 28248996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception by Palpation: Development and Testing of a Haptic Ferrogranular Jamming Surface.
    Rørvik SB; Auflem M; Dybvik H; Steinert M
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():745234. PubMed ID: 34651019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill.
    Lin Y; Wang X; Wu F; Chen X; Wang C; Shen G
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():122-9. PubMed ID: 24380817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.