480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2959834)
1. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
Crossley MA
Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Issues in the nontreatment of handicapped newborns.
Lynch JJ
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1989 Feb; 15(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 2495502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
Robertson JA
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 3745837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding life-sustaining treatment from severely defective newborns: who should decide?
Greenstein LJ
Med Law; 1987; 6(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 3312908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns.
Glasow SB
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Withholding lifesaving treatment from defective newborns: an equal protection analysis.
Wood AT
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):853-79. PubMed ID: 11649209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The plight of the genetically handicapped newborn: a comparative analysis.
Smith GP
Holdsworth Law Rev; 1984; 9(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 12091924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.
Paige C; Karnofsky EB
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
Smith SR
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Which infants should live? On the usefulness and limitations of Robert Weir's Selective Nontreatment of Handicapped Newborns.
Churchill LR
Soc Sci Med; 1985; 20(11):1097-102. PubMed ID: 3161186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns.
Reiser SJ
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 3745836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Putting hospitals on notice.
Fost N
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Aug; 12(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 6215343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selective nontreatment--one year later: reflections and a response.
Weir RF
Soc Sci Med; 1985; 20(11):1109-17. PubMed ID: 3161188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
Fost N
Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Life and death and the handicapped newborn.
Koop CE
Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):39-44. PubMed ID: 11651893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The future of Baby Doe.
Singer P; Kuhse H
New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Selecting neonatal ethics.
Frader JE
Soc Sci Med; 1985; 20(11):1085-90. PubMed ID: 3161184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care.
Gorski SL
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
Sarno JJ
Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
