105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29599081)
1. Improvement of early detection of breast cancer through collaborative multi-country efforts: Medical physics component.
Mora P; Faulkner K; Mahmoud AM; Gershan V; Kausik A; Zdesar U; Brandan ME; Kurt S; Davidović J; Salama DH; Aribal E; Odio C; Chaturvedi AK; Sabih Z; Vujnović S; Paez D; Delis H
Phys Med; 2018 Apr; 48():127-134. PubMed ID: 29599081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement of early detection of breast cancer through collaborative multi-country efforts: Observational clinical study.
Aribal E; Mora P; Chaturvedi AK; Hertl K; Davidović J; Salama DH; Gershan V; Kadivec M; Odio C; Popli M; Kisembo H; Sabih Z; Vujnović S; Kayhan A; Delis H; Paez D; Giammarile F
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():31-38. PubMed ID: 31084756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Latin American dose survey results in mammography studies under IAEA programme: radiological protection of patients in medical exposures (TSA3).
Mora P; Blanco S; Khoury H; Leyton F; Cárdenas J; Defaz MY; Garay F; Telón F; Aguilar JG; Roas N; Gamarra M; Blanco D; Quintero AR; Nader A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 24993012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. IAEA support to medical physics in nuclear medicine.
Meghzifene A; Sgouros G
Semin Nucl Med; 2013 May; 43(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 23561455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LATIN AMERICAN IMAGE QUALITY SURVEY IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY STUDIES.
Mora P; Khoury H; Bitelli R; Quintero AR; Garay F; Aguilar JG; Gamarra M; Ubeda C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 27009246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The IAEA remote and automated quality control methodology for radiography and mammography.
Mora P; Pfeiffer D; Zhang G; Bosmans H; Delis H; Razi Z; Arreola M; Tsapaki V
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 22(11):126-142. PubMed ID: 34623023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing Digital Mammographic Image Quality for Full-Field Digital Detectors: Artifacts Encountered during the QC Process.
Jayadevan R; Armada MJ; Shaheen R; Mulcahy C; Slanetz PJ
Radiographics; 2015; 35(7):2080-9. PubMed ID: 26562238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety in radiation oncology: the role of international initiatives by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Abdel-Wahab M; Rosenblatt E; Holmberg O; Meghzifene A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Nov; 8(11):789-94. PubMed ID: 22051464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) actions on radiation protection of patients in many countries.
Rehani MM; Tsapaki V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):34-7. PubMed ID: 21725082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of Contrast to Noise Ratio and Signal Difference to Noise Ratio Based on QA and QC Guidelines in CR Mammography].
Nagami A; Ishii M; Ishii R; Kodama S; Sanada T; Yoshida A
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Jun; 72(6):503-13. PubMed ID: 27320154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eight years of quality control in Bulgaria: impact on mammography practice.
Avramova-Cholakova S; Lilkov G; Kaneva M; Terziev K; Nakov I; Mutkurov N; Kovacheva D; Ivanova M; Vasilev D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):359-62. PubMed ID: 25836697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries.
Hendrick RE; Klabunde C; Grivegnee A; Pou G; Ballard-Barbash R
Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 12108532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography equipment performance, image quality and mean glandular dose in Malta.
Borg M; Badr I; Royle GJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):168-83. PubMed ID: 23525916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3834-47. PubMed ID: 26133585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Position paper: recommendations for a digital mammography quality assurance program V4.0.
Heggie JCP; Barnes P; Cartwright L; Diffey J; Tse J; Herley J; McLean ID; Thomson FJ; Grewal RK; Collins LT
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 40(3):491-543. PubMed ID: 28914430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Method of measuring NEQ as a quality control metric for digital mammography.
Bloomquist AK; Mainprize JG; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031905. PubMed ID: 24593723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of international and developed practices of medical physics from a legislative and regulatory point of view and its applicability and comparison with Pakistan.
Jafri MA; Farrukh S; Ilyas N; Memon SA
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Jun; 42(2):407-414. PubMed ID: 30949981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I.
Bloomquist AK; Yaffe MJ; Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Mawdsley GE; Bright S; Shen SZ; Mahesh M; Nickoloff EL; Fleischman RC; Williams MB; Maidment AD; Beideck DJ; Och J; Seibert JA
Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):719-36. PubMed ID: 16878575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
