These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29599081)

  • 21. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. AUTOMATED QC FOR INTERVENTIONAL SYSTEMS AND MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Visanuyanont T; Gluchowski P; Hillberg E; Moberg T; Svalkvist A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Oct; 195(3-4):399-406. PubMed ID: 33912965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conformance of mean glandular dose from phantom and patient data in mammography.
    Kelaranta A; Toroi P; Timonen M; Komssi S; Kortesniemi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):342-53. PubMed ID: 25114321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trial of a proposed protocol for constancy control of digital mammography systems.
    Pedersen K; Landmark ID
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5537-46. PubMed ID: 20095266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Applicability of ACR breast dosimetry methodology to a digital mammography system.
    Tomon JJ; Johnson TE; Swenson KN; Schauer DA
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):799-807. PubMed ID: 16878582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physicists in mammography--a historical perspective.
    Rothenberg LN; Haus AG
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 2):1923-34. PubMed ID: 8587546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exploratory survey of image quality on CR digital mammography imaging systems in Mexico.
    Gaona E; Rivera T; Arreola M; Franco J; Molina N; Alvarez B; Azorín CG; Casian G
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Jan; 83 Pt C():245-8. PubMed ID: 23938078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality Control Measures in Tanzania: Is it Done?
    Ngoye WM; Motto JA; Muhogora WE
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2015 Sep; 46(3S):S23-S30. PubMed ID: 31052103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Guidelines for high quality mammography screening.
    Matveeva N; Korneti K; Antevska S; Strateska A
    Prilozi; 2008 Dec; 29(2):345-54. PubMed ID: 19259058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative performance of modern digital mammography systems in a large breast screening program.
    Yaffe MJ; Bloomquist AK; Hunter DM; Mawdsley GE; Chiarelli AM; Muradali D; Mainprize JG
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121915. PubMed ID: 24320526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. IMPLEMENTATION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM IN RADIOGRAPHY-2-YEAR EXPERIENCE OF COLLABORATION WITH PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS IN WEST REGION OF CROATIA.
    Šegota D; Diklic A; Jurkovic S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(3):329-334. PubMed ID: 30590844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medical physics is alive and well and growing in South East Asia.
    Ng K; Pirabul R; Peralta A; Soejoko D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 9141310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improving Quality and Access to Radiation Therapy-An IAEA Perspective.
    Abdel-Wahab M; Zubizarreta E; Polo A; Meghzifene A
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 27(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 28325236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223.
    Sechopoulos I; Sabol JM; Berglund J; Bolch WE; Brateman L; Christodoulou E; Flynn M; Geiser W; Goodsitt M; Jones AK; Lo JY; Maidment AD; Nishino K; Nosratieh A; Ren B; Segars WP; Von Tiedemann M
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091501. PubMed ID: 25186375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.