286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29599404)
21. Impact of time of flight and point spread function on quantitative parameters of lung lesions in
Huang K; Feng Y; Liang W; Li L
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34773998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET/CT with a Large Axial Field of View for Reducing Whole-Body Acquisition Time.
Akamatsu G; Uba K; Taniguchi T; Mitsumoto K; Narisue A; Tsutsui Y; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Jun; 42(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 24799607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction of
Lindström E; Lindsjö L; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jun; 7(1):40. PubMed ID: 32542512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; Brahmer A; Mavroeidi IA; Zarrad F; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Seifert R; Sraieb M; Weber M; Kersting D
BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):899. PubMed ID: 35978274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of time-of-flight, resolution recovery, and noise modelling in reconstruction algorithms in non-solid-state detectors PET/CT scanners: - multi-centric comparison of activity recovery in a 68Ge phantom.
Chauvie S; Bergesio F; De Ponti E; Morzenti S; De Maggi A; Ragazzoni M; Chiesa C; Matheoud R
Phys Med; 2020 Jul; 75():85-91. PubMed ID: 32559650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm suppresses edge artifacts in PET reconstruction based on point-spread-function.
Yamaguchi S; Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Ishii K; Inoue K; Fukushi M
Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():73-79. PubMed ID: 29609821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Edge Artifacts in Point Spread Function-based PET Reconstruction in Relation to Object Size and Reconstruction Parameters.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Umezu Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2017; 5(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 28660224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.
Taniguchi T; Akamatsu G; Kasahara Y; Mitsumoto K; Baba S; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Mikasa S; Kidera D; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25258046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Image quality and detectability in Siemens Biograph PET/MRI and PET/CT systems-a phantom study.
Øen SK; Aasheim LB; Eikenes L; Karlberg AM
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Aug; 6(1):16. PubMed ID: 31385052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimization of a shorter variable-acquisition time for legs to achieve true whole-body PET/CT images.
Umeda T; Miwa K; Murata T; Miyaji N; Wagatsuma K; Motegi K; Terauchi T; Koizumi M
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Dec; 40(4):861-868. PubMed ID: 29098601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Influence of Reconstruction FOV and Matrix Size on the Quantitative Accuracy of FDG-PET: Comparison between OSEM and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood].
Mikami S; Nakamura F; Nakamura A; Torizuka T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(5):454-462. PubMed ID: 34011788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of two commercial whole body PET systems based on LSO and BGO crystals respectively for brain imaging.
Trébossen R; Comtat C; Brulon V; Bailly P; Meyer ME
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1399-409. PubMed ID: 19472647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detectability of small objects in PET/computed tomography phantom images with Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction.
Macnab MF; Biggans TJ; Mckiddie FI; Pether MI; Straiton JB; Staff RT
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Jul; 41(7):666-673. PubMed ID: 32404647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
