These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29599584)

  • 21. Comparison of the reproducibility of panoramic radiographs between dentulous and edentulous patients.
    Park JW; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Jun; 44(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 24944958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiographic evaluation of the mandible to predict age and sex in subadults.
    Ulusoy AT; Ozkara E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2022 Aug; 80(6):419-426. PubMed ID: 35015609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.
    Vazquez L; Nizamaldin Y; Combescure C; Nedir R; Bischof M; Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Carrel JP; Belser UC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Panoramic radiographs: determination of mandibular steepness.
    Alhaija ES
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 29(2):165-6. PubMed ID: 15719923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exploring Age and Gender Identification Through Mandibular Parameters Using Orthopantomography: An Observational Study.
    Arthanari A; Senthilkumar A; Ramalingam K; Prathap L; Ravindran V
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55788. PubMed ID: 38590503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does the panoramic radiography have the power to identify the gonial angle in orthodontics?
    Okşayan R; Aktan AM; Sökücü O; Haştar E; Ciftci ME
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():219708. PubMed ID: 23365514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in 5 anatomic parameters of mandibular body morphology by gonial angle size in dentulous Japanese subjects.
    Osato S; Kuroyama I; Nakajima S; Ogawa T; Misaki K
    Ann Anat; 2012 Sep; 194(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 22429867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of Mandibular Surface Area Changes in Bruxers
    Padmaja Satheeswarakumar L; Elenjickal TJ; Ram SKM; Thangasamy K
    Open Dent J; 2018; 12():753-761. PubMed ID: 30369985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of gonial angle in relation to age, gender, and dentition status by radiological and anthropometric methods.
    Upadhyay RB; Upadhyay J; Agrawal P; Rao NN
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 23087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular ramus for gender estimation: Retrospective study.
    Damera A; Mohanalakhsmi J; Yellarthi PK; Rezwana BM
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2016; 8(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 27555722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cephalometric: evaluation of influence of edentulousness on mandibular morphology: a comparative study.
    Uma M; Shetty R; Shenoy KK
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Sep; 13(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 24431746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of the validity of orthopantomographs in the evaluation of mandibular steepness in Libya.
    Ganeiber T; Bugaighis I
    J Orthod Sci; 2018; 7():14. PubMed ID: 29963509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forensic Gender Determination by Using Mandibular Morphometric Indices an Iranian Population: A Panoramic Radiographic Cross-Sectional Study.
    Esfehani M; Ghasemi M; Katiraee A; Tofangchiha M; Alizadeh A; Taghavi-Damghani F; Testarelli L; Reda R
    J Imaging; 2023 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 36826959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age- and sex-related mandibular dimensional changes: A radiomorphometric analysis on panoramic radiographs.
    Shah PH; Venkatesh R; More CB; Vaishnavee V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(1):113-117. PubMed ID: 32246692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Forensic Gender Prediction by Using Mandibular Morphometric Indices: A Panoramic Radiograph Study.
    Arthanari A; Sureshbabu S; Ramalingam K; Prathap L; Ravindran V
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56603. PubMed ID: 38646405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gender determination by morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus in sriganganagar population: A digital panoramic study.
    ; Verma P; Mahajan P; Puri A; Kaur S; Mehta S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(3):444-448. PubMed ID: 32769281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital Radiographic Study of Gonial angle in Forensic Odontology in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
    Srii R; Koju S; Mahanta SK; Marla V; Niroula D; Upadhyaya C; Murthy PS
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2021 Apr; 59(236):350-355. PubMed ID: 34508539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes in jawbones of male patients with chronic renal failure on digital panoramic radiographs.
    Dagistan S; Miloglu O; Caglayan F
    Eur J Dent; 2016; 10(1):64-68. PubMed ID: 27011742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiomorphometric indices and their relation to alveolar bone loss in completely edentulous Turkish patients: a retrospective study.
    Yüzügüllü B; Gulsahi A; Imirzalioglu P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 19231567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Correlation between Radiomorphometric Indices and Edentulous Mandibular Arches to Diagnose Osteoporosis Using Orthopantomogram in West Bengal State in India.
    Dwivedi H; Singh B; Gupta P; Das M; Jain R; Kumar S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 34257177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.