142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29600503)
1. Reproducibility and Validity of a Questionnaire Measuring Treatment Burden on Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Diabetic Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ).
Ishii H; Shin K; Tosaki T; Haga T; Nakajima Y; Shiraiwa T; Watanabe N; Koizumi M; Nakajima H; Okada S; Mashitani T; Mohri T; Akai Y
Diabetes Ther; 2018 Jun; 9(3):1001-1019. PubMed ID: 29600503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment Burden on Once-Weekly Omarigliptin Versus Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial (ONWARD-DPP4 Study).
Ishii H; Kamei N; Shimono D; Niiya T; Tosaki T; Kitazawa T; Suzuki D; Wakasa Y; Seino H; Oishi M; Ohashi H; Higami K; Akai H;
Diabetes Ther; 2023 Oct; 14(10):1639-1658. PubMed ID: 37468684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Mei Y; Yang X; Li Y; Zhang X; Gui J; Wang Y; Chen W; Chen M; Liu C; Zhang L
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes; 2023; 16():663-675. PubMed ID: 36919103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correction to: Reproducibility and Validity of a Questionnaire Measuring Treatment Burden on Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Diabetic Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ).
Ishii H; Shin K; Tosaki T; Haga T; Nakajima Y; Shiraiwa T; Watanabe N; Koizumi M; Nakajima H; Okada S; Mashitani T; Mohri T; Akai Y
Diabetes Ther; 2018 Aug; 9(4):1719. PubMed ID: 29909478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Italian version of the WHO-Well-Being Questionnaire (WHO-WBQ) and the WHO-Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (WHO-DTSQ).
Nicolucci A; Giorgino R; Cucinotta D; Zoppini G; Muggeo M; Squatrito S; Corsi A; Lostia S; Pappalardo L; Benaduce E; Girelli A; Galeone F; Maldonato A; Perriello G; Pata P; Marra G; Coronel GA
Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2004 Aug; 17(4):235-43. PubMed ID: 15575345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the Turkish version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (s) on a sample of diabetics of three consecutive monitoring periods.
Özmen B; Eser E; Özkaya Kafesçiler S; Pala T; Güçlü F; Hekimsoy Z
Acta Diabetol; 2010 Dec; 47 Suppl 1():123-31. PubMed ID: 19936604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of the ICU Nurse-Physician Questionnaire (ICU N-P-Q): testing reliability and validity in neonatal intensive care units in Japan.
Sasaki H; Yonemoto N; Mori R; Nishida T; Kusuda S; Nakayama T
BMJ Open; 2016 May; 6(5):e010105. PubMed ID: 27160841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and Internal Consistency of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.
Culliton SE; Bryant DM; MacDonald SJ; Hibbert KM; Chesworth BM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 29529620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms.
Yazici Güleç M; Güleç H; Simşek G; Turhan M; Aydin Sünbül E
Compr Psychiatry; 2012 Jul; 53(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 22000476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using person reported outcomes: Psychometric properties of the German diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ) for teens and parents.
Kim-Dorner SJ; Saßmann H; Heidtmann B; Kapellen TM; Kordonouri O; Nettelrodt KME; Schweizer R; von Sengbusch S; Lange K
Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(6):e27614. PubMed ID: 38524562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Validity, reliability, and acceptability of the brief version of the self-management knowledge, attitude, and behavior assessment scale for diabetes patients].
Wu YZ; Wang WJ; Feng NP; Chen B; Li GC; Liu JW; Liu HL; Yang YY
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 50(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 27412833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric evaluation of the Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q), a novel measure to assess satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women.
Flood EM; Beusterien KM; Green H; Shikiar R; Baran RW; Amonkar MM; Cella D
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Jul; 4():42. PubMed ID: 16834773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a diabetes diet-related quality-of-life scale.
Sato E; Suzukamo Y; Miyashita M; Kazuma K
Diabetes Care; 2004 Jun; 27(6):1271-5. PubMed ID: 15161774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A test of the reliability and validity of a diabetes specific quality of life scale in a Nigerian hospital.
Kolawole BA; Abodunde O; Ikem RT; Fabiyi AK
Qual Life Res; 2004 Sep; 13(7):1287-95. PubMed ID: 15473507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Type 2 Diabetes and Health Promotion Scale (T2DHPS): a diabetes-specific measure of lifestyle.
Saffari M; Karimi T; Koenig HG; Al-Zaben F
Scand J Caring Sci; 2015 Sep; 29(3):603-12. PubMed ID: 25236973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.
Schultz H; Skræp U; Schultz Larsen T; Rekvad LE; Littau-Larsen J; Schmidt SF; Möller S; Qvist N
Scand J Pain; 2019 Jan; 19(1):117-130. PubMed ID: 30352045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor.
Ishii H; Suzaki Y; Miyata Y; Matsui S
Diabetes Ther; 2019 Aug; 10(4):1369-1380. PubMed ID: 31214997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Final 24-Item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaires (EOSQ-24): Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness.
Matsumoto H; Williams B; Park HY; Yoshimachi JY; Roye BD; Roye DP; Akbarnia BA; Emans J; Skaggs D; Smith JT; Vitale MG
J Pediatr Orthop; 2018 Mar; 38(3):144-151. PubMed ID: 27299779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire: A Comparison with the DASH and SF-36 Questionnaires.
Oda T; Abe Y; Katsumi Y; Ohi H; Nakamura T; Inagaki K
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 27454507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of an Arabic version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in Qatar.
Wilbur K; Al Hammaq AO
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2016 Mar; 113():53-9. PubMed ID: 26972963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
