These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29602103)

  • 21. Comparing membrane and spacer biofouling by Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Gram-positive Anoxybacillus sp. in forward osmosis.
    Bogler A; Rice D; Perreault F; Bar-Zeev E
    Biofouling; 2019 Jan; 35(1):104-116. PubMed ID: 30786764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combined organic-inorganic fouling of forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes.
    Arkhangelsky E; Wicaksana F; Tang C; Al-Rabiah AA; Al-Zahrani SM; Wang R
    Water Res; 2012 Dec; 46(19):6329-38. PubMed ID: 23026125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impaired Performance of Pressure-Retarded Osmosis due to Irreversible Biofouling.
    Bar-Zeev E; Perreault F; Straub AP; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(21):13050-8. PubMed ID: 26426100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling.
    Wang Y; Wicaksana F; Tang CY; Fane AG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(18):7102-9. PubMed ID: 20735033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial and temporal evolution of organic foulant layers on reverse osmosis membranes in wastewater reuse applications.
    Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
    Water Res; 2014 Jul; 58():102-10. PubMed ID: 24747141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting the impact of feed spacer modification on biofouling by hydraulic characterization and biofouling studies in membrane fouling simulators.
    Siddiqui A; Lehmann S; Bucs SS; Fresquet M; Fel L; Prest EIEC; Ogier J; Schellenberg C; van Loosdrecht MCM; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2017 Mar; 110():281-287. PubMed ID: 28027527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of membrane bioreactor solids retention time on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for wastewater reuse.
    Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
    Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():53-61. PubMed ID: 24316181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sustainable water recovery from oily wastewater via forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD).
    Zhang S; Wang P; Fu X; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2014 Apr; 52():112-21. PubMed ID: 24463175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Energy efficient 3D printed column type feed spacer for membrane filtration.
    Ali SM; Qamar A; Kerdi S; Phuntsho S; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ghaffour N; Shon HK
    Water Res; 2019 Nov; 164():114961. PubMed ID: 31421514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Engineered multi-scale roughness of carbon nanofiller-embedded 3D printed spacers for membrane distillation.
    Jeong S; Gu B; Choi S; Ahn SK; Lee J; Lee J; Jeong S
    Water Res; 2023 Mar; 231():119649. PubMed ID: 36702024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Water reclamation from emulsified oily wastewater via effective forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes under the PRO mode.
    Han G; de Wit JS; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 81():54-63. PubMed ID: 26043371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Organic fouling of thin-film composite polyamide and cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membranes by oppositely charged macromolecules.
    Gu Y; Wang YN; Wei J; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2013 Apr; 47(5):1867-74. PubMed ID: 23384517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Highly permeable double-skinned forward osmosis membranes for anti-fouling in the emulsified oil-water separation process.
    Duong PH; Chung TS; Wei S; Irish L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 24621207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Roles and performance enhancement of feed spacer in spiral wound membrane modules for water treatment: A 20-year review on research evolvement.
    Lin W; Zhang Y; Li D; Wang XM; Huang X
    Water Res; 2021 Jun; 198():117146. PubMed ID: 33945947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation forward osmosis process using thin-film composite mixed matrix membrane with functionalized carbon nanotube blended polyethersulfone support layer.
    Choi HG; Son M; Choi H
    Chemosphere; 2017 Oct; 185():1181-1188. PubMed ID: 28772356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of vibratory shear-enhanced processing module-integrated three-dimensional printed spacers for enhanced wastewater ultrafiltration.
    Kertész S
    Water Environ Res; 2023 Aug; 95(8):e10912. PubMed ID: 37475515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of anti-biofouling feed spacers to improve performance of reverse osmosis modules.
    Rice D; Barrios AC; Xiao Z; Bogler A; Bar-Zeev E; Perreault F
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 145():599-607. PubMed ID: 30199804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hydrophilic, bactericidal nanoheater-enabled reverse osmosis membranes to improve fouling resistance.
    Ray JR; Tadepalli S; Nergiz SZ; Liu KK; You L; Tang Y; Singamaneni S; Jun YS
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jun; 7(21):11117-26. PubMed ID: 25941970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.