These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
939 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29602344)
1. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking. Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking. Richards MR; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Walther DB; Rosenstiel S; Sacksteder JM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 25836007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of facial attractiveness in patients with slight-to-borderline treatment need according to the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as judged by eye tracking. Johnson EK; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):297-310. PubMed ID: 28153159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of dental and background facial attractiveness on facial attractiveness and perceived integrity and social and intellectual qualities. Papio MA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):464-474.e1. PubMed ID: 31582118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of the mandible position to the facial profile perception of a female facial profile: An eye-tracking study. Huang P; Cai B; Zhou C; Wang W; Wang X; Gao D; Bao B Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Nov; 156(5):641-652. PubMed ID: 31677673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of malocclusion on social aspects in adults: study via eye tracking technology and questionnaire. Gasparello GG; Júnior SLM; Hartmann GC; Meira TM; Camargo ES; Pithon MM; Tanaka O Prog Orthod; 2022 Jan; 23(1):4. PubMed ID: 35067765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness. Chang CA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Springer NC; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel S; Christensen JC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e171-80. PubMed ID: 21967955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: An eye-tracking study. Wang X; Cai B; Cao Y; Zhou C; Yang L; Liu R; Long X; Wang W; Gao D; Bao B Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Oct; 150(4):601-610. PubMed ID: 27692417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual attention during the evaluation of facial attractiveness is influenced by facial angles and smile. Kim SH; Hwang S; Hong YJ; Kim JJ; Kim KH; Chung CJ Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 29376732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eye fixations when viewing faces. Hickman L; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Speer S J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 20045820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the influence of dental and facial aesthetics in determining overall attractiveness. Prasad KN; Sabrish S; Mathew S; Shivamurthy PG; Pattabiraman V; Sagarkar R Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):684-697. PubMed ID: 30385289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study between different groups of esthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and eye tracking. Leandro de Oliveira W; Saga AY; Ignácio SA; Rodrigues Justino EJ; Tanaka OM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jul; 156(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 31256841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness. Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contribution of facial components to the attractiveness of the smiling face in male and female patients: A cross-sectional correlation study. Godinho J; Gonçalves RP; Jardim L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Jan; 157(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 31901288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Smile prevails over other facial components of male facial esthetics. Patusco V; Carvalho CK; Lenza MA; Faber J J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Aug; 149(8):680-687. PubMed ID: 29866363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of dental and facial aesthetics in adolescents. al Yami EA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Van 't Hof MA Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 9753821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of smile index and incisal edge position on perception of attractiveness in different age groups. Chou JC; Nelson A; Katwal D; Elathamna EN; Durski MT J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 43(11):855-862. PubMed ID: 27612023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perception of children with visible untreated and treated caries. Tschammler C; Zimmermann D; Batschkus S; Wiegand A; Folta-Schoofs K J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():37-42. PubMed ID: 29792910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using artificial intelligence to determine the influence of dental aesthetics on facial attractiveness in comparison to other facial modifications. Obwegeser D; Timofte R; Mayer C; Eliades T; Bornstein MM; Schätzle MA; Patcas R Eur J Orthod; 2022 Aug; 44(4):445-451. PubMed ID: 35532375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of face proportions on face attractiveness. Przylipiak M; Przylipiak J; Terlikowski R; Lubowicka E; Chrostek L; Przylipiak A J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):954-959. PubMed ID: 30291673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]