BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29602346)

  • 1. Dentoskeletal effects of facemask therapy in skeletal Class III cleft patients with or without bone graft.
    Zhang Y; Jia H; Fu Z; Huang Y; Wang Z; Guo R; Shen J; Li W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):542-549. PubMed ID: 29602346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of cleft type, facemask anchorage method, and alveolar bone graft on maxillary protraction: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yang IH; Chang YI; Kim TW; Ahn SJ; Lim WH; Lee NK; Baek SH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Mar; 49(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21740169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate in mixed dentition: cephalometric evaluation after completion of growth.
    Susami T; Okayasu M; Inokuchi T; Ohkubo K; Uchino N; Uwatoko K; Takahashi-Ichikawa N; Nagahama K; Takato T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 Sep; 51(5):514-24. PubMed ID: 24010865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Long-Term Use of Facemask With Miniplate on Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    On SW; Baek SH; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 29(2):309-314. PubMed ID: 29135737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Class III Patients With and Without Cleft Lip and Palate: An Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Study.
    Lin Y; Fu Z; Guo R; Ma L; Li W
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Apr; 58(4):429-437. PubMed ID: 32985240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-Year Follow-Up of a Patient With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Treated With Maxillary Protraction and Alveolar Bone Grafting: An Approach Exploring the Potential Power of Growth.
    Chen Z; Shi J; Jin C; Chen Z; Tong Q; Li Z; Chen Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):e818-e824. PubMed ID: 30320686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate : Evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol.
    Dogan E; Seckin O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2020 May; 81(3):209-219. PubMed ID: 32342120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
    Ahn HW; Kim KW; Yang IH; Choi JY; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):935-41. PubMed ID: 22380632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D soft tissue changes in facial morphology in patients with cleft lip and palate and class III mal occlusion under therapy with rapid maxillary expansion and delaire facemask.
    Sade Hoefert C; Bacher M; Herberts T; Krimmel M; Reinert S; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Mar; 71(2):136-51. PubMed ID: 20354840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: 3-dimensional assessment of maxillary effects.
    Yatabe M; Garib DG; Faco RAS; de Clerck H; Janson G; Nguyen T; Cevidanes LHS; Ruellas AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):327-335. PubMed ID: 28863913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of Different Methods of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Lip and Palate Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Jahanbin A; Shafaee H; Pahlavan H; Bardideh E; Entezari M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 May; 34(3):875-880. PubMed ID: 36044271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in a patient with complete cleft lip and palate: A case report.
    Garib D; Yatabe M; de Souza Faco RA; Gregório L; Cevidanes L; de Clerck H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Feb; 153(2):290-297. PubMed ID: 29407507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years.
    Tindlund RS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jul; 31(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 7918525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxillary expansion and protraction in correction of midface retrusion in a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patient.
    Kawakami M; Yagi T; Takada K
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 12169036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative assessment of facemask therapy with and without skeletal anchorage in growing Class III patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP): A single-center, prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Dutta S; Batra P; Raghavan S; Sharma K; Talwar A; Arora A; Srivastava A
    Spec Care Dentist; 2024; 44(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 37084175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentoskeletal Effects of the Modified Tandem Appliance vs the Facemask Appliance in the Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Husson AH; Burhan AS; Salma FB; Nawaya FR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):522-9. PubMed ID: 27595716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentoskeletal effects of maxillary protraction in cleft patients with repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions.
    da Luz Vieira G; de Menezes LM; de Lima EM; Rizzatto S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Jul; 46(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 19642763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.