These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29602712)

  • 1. Hierarchical Bayesian models of delusion.
    Williams D
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 May; 61():129-147. PubMed ID: 29602712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. I want to believe: delusion, motivated reasoning, and Bayesian decision theory.
    Rigoli F; Martinelli C; Pezzulo G
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2021 Nov; 26(6):408-420. PubMed ID: 34558392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biased belief in the Bayesian brain: A deeper look at the evidence.
    Tappin BM; Gadsby S
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Feb; 68():107-114. PubMed ID: 30665186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian perspective on delusions: Suggestions for modifying two reasoning tasks.
    Pfuhl G
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():4-11. PubMed ID: 27566911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How delusion is formed?
    Park JS; Kang UG
    Med Hypotheses; 2016 Feb; 87():61-5. PubMed ID: 26826642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The erotetic theory of delusional thinking.
    Parrott M; Koralus P
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2015; 20(5):398-415. PubMed ID: 26367790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Etiopathogeny of the delusion of pregnancy using a literature review: Role of hyperprolactinemia and application of the theory of abductive inference].
    Levy F; Mouchabac S; Peretti CS
    Encephale; 2014 Apr; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 23830681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity.
    Eva B; Hartmann S
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Oct; 125(5):806-821. PubMed ID: 30024177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian accounts and black swans: Questioning the erotetic theory of delusional thinking.
    McKay R
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2015; 20(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 26372015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Belief-bias reasoning in non-clinical delusion-prone individuals.
    Anandakumar T; Connaughton E; Coltheart M; Langdon R
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():71-78. PubMed ID: 28318497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Belief-bias reasoning in non-clinical delusion-prone individuals.
    Anandakumar T; Connaughton E; Coltheart M; Langdon R
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Mar; 54():211-218. PubMed ID: 27614050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generative framework for the study of delusions.
    Erdmann T; Mathys C
    Schizophr Res; 2022 Jul; 245():42-49. PubMed ID: 33648810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confirmation bias emerges from an approximation to Bayesian reasoning.
    Pilgrim C; Sanborn A; Malthouse E; Hills TT
    Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105693. PubMed ID: 38244398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Jumping to conclusions" in delusion-prone participants: an experimental economics approach.
    van der Leer L; McKay R
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2014; 19(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 24313625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Jumping to conclusions and the continuum of delusional beliefs.
    Warman DM; Lysaker PH; Martin JM; Davis L; Haudenschield SL
    Behav Res Ther; 2007 Jun; 45(6):1255-69. PubMed ID: 17052687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive processing simplified: The infotropic machine.
    Thornton C
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Mar; 112():13-24. PubMed ID: 27102775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Delusions and delusional reasoning.
    McGuire L; Junginger J; Adams SG; Burright R; Donovick P
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2001 May; 110(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 11358020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resolving the so-called "probabilistic paradoxes in legal reasoning" with Bayesian networks.
    de Zoete J; Fenton N; Noguchi T; Lagnado D
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):367-379. PubMed ID: 31256808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Derationalizing Delusions.
    Bell V; Raihani N; Wilkinson S
    Clin Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 9(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 33552704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.