249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29602884)
1. Meta-analysis: mistake or milestone in medicine?
Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Alba AC; Ross H
Heart; 2018 Oct; 104(19):1559-1561. PubMed ID: 29602884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Transplantation: Challenges and Pitfalls?
Wong G; Sharma A; Teixeira-Pinto A; Howell M
Transplantation; 2018 Sep; 102(9):1415-1418. PubMed ID: 30124633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of systematic review and meta-analysis in modern cytopathology.
Trimboli P; Treglia G; Giovanella L; Bongiovanni M
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 31381260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practical and updated guidelines on performing meta-analyses of non-randomized studies in interventional cardiology.
Navarese EP; Koziński M; Pafundi T; Andreotti F; Buffon A; Servi SD; Kubica J
Cardiol J; 2011; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21305479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noblesse oblige: critical issues at the highest level of clinical evidence.
Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():vi-viii. PubMed ID: 30654870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The Cochrane Collaboration and the practice of evidence-based cardiology].
Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 19(11):1175-82. PubMed ID: 11201633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Sometimes Bigger Is Indeed Better.
Vetter TR
Anesth Analg; 2019 Mar; 128(3):575-583. PubMed ID: 30649072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?
Afshari A; Wetterslev J; Smith AF
Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27804113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-Based Decision-Making 2: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
Bello A; Vandermeer B; Wiebe N; Garg AX; Tonelli M
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():405-428. PubMed ID: 33871856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ever-shifting source of authority on what works in clinical medicine.
Mercuri M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Oct; 25(5):703-705. PubMed ID: 31418489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis].
Zhang JH; Shang HC; Zhang BL
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 6(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 18405597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review and meta-analysis as tools for evidence-based medicine.
Iniesta-Sepúlveda M; Ríos A
Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2024 Jun; 102(6):336-337. PubMed ID: 38697351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perfect Top of the Evidence Hierarchy Pyramid, Maybe Not So Perfect: lessons learned by a novice researcher engaging in a meta-analysis project.
Herner M
BMJ Evid Based Med; 2019 Aug; 24(4):130-132. PubMed ID: 30842066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders.
van Tulder MW; Assendelft WJ; Koes BW; Bouter LM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(20):2323-30. PubMed ID: 9355211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review and meta-analysis as a support tools for research and clinical practice.
Villasís-Keever MÁ; Rendón-Macías ME; García H; Miranda-Novales MG; Escamilla-Núñez A
Rev Alerg Mex; 2020; 67(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 32447868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Valuable pieces of the clinical decision-making puzzle.
Szekeres M; Valdes K
J Hand Ther; 2019; 32(2):139-140. PubMed ID: 31171083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Point: evidence-based medicine has a sound scientific base.
Karanicolas PJ; Kunz R; Guyatt GH
Chest; 2008 May; 133(5):1067-71. PubMed ID: 18460513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A Primer on Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Nguyen NH; Singh S
Semin Liver Dis; 2018 May; 38(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 29871017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analytic rage or race for evidence-based interventional cardiology?
Biondi-Zoccai G
EuroIntervention; 2009 Sep; 5(4):409, 411; author reply 411, 413. PubMed ID: 19755325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
