271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29602979)
1. Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.
Montanari E; Grimm C; Schwameis R; Kuessel L; Polterauer S; Paternostro C; Husslein H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 29602979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of conization type on the resected cone volume: results of a retrospective multi-center study.
Grimm C; Brammen L; Sliutz G; Weigert M; Sevelda P; Pils S; Reinthaller A; Polterauer S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):1081-6. PubMed ID: 23649464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) without histological proof of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion: Results of a two-year continuous retrospective study.
Pecourt M; Gondry J; Foulon A; Lanta-Delmas S; Sergent F; Chevreau J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 49(6):101621. PubMed ID: 31430562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical cone measurements and residual disease in LLETZ conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Antonakou A; Sindos M; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Sakellaropoulos G; Antsaklis A
In Vivo; 2011; 25(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 21709016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the trend toward less deep excisions in LLETZ to minimize obstetric risk lead to less favorable oncological outcomes?
Lara-Peñaranda R; Rodríguez-López PM; Plitt-Stevens J; Ortiz-González A; Remezal-Solano M; Martínez-Cendán JP
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Mar; 148(3):316-324. PubMed ID: 31814122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conization of the uterine cervix: does the level of gynecologist's training predict margin status?
Ulrich D; Tamussino K; Petru E; Haas J; Reich O
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2012 Jul; 31(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 22653354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Number of fragments, margin status and thermal artifacts of conized specimens from LLETZ surgery to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Bittencourt DD; Zanine RM; Sebastião AM; Taha NS; Speck NG; Ribalta JC
Sao Paulo Med J; 2012; 130(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22481754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: A 2nd retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital.
van Velthoven K; Poppe W; Verschuere H; Arbyn M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():224-231. PubMed ID: 28822944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pilot study comparing efficacy of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Excisor with loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Sanu O; Pal A; George S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jul; 151(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 20303641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. C-LETZ versus large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.
Boonlikit S; Thitisagulwong S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1173-9. PubMed ID: 22710953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected women.
Foulot H; Heard I; Potard V; Costagliola D; Chapron C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 18760524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term predictors of residual or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 after treatment with a large loop excision of the transformation zone: a retrospective study.
Fernández-Montolí ME; Tous S; Medina G; Castellarnau M; García-Tejedor A; de Sanjosé S
BJOG; 2020 Feb; 127(3):377-387. PubMed ID: 31631477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Secondary excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an evaluation of two treatment methods.
Bowring J; Tulloch I; Phadnis SV; Young MP; Evans H; Walker P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 20604658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
