These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29603692)

  • 21. Effect of Postoperative Bleaching on Microleakage of Etch-and-Rinse and Self-etch Adhesives.
    Mortazavi V; Fathi M; Soltani F
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2011; 8(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 22132010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
    Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
    Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Microleakage of Class V Cavities restored with the Embrace WetBond Class V Composite Resin and Conventional Opallis Composite Resin.
    Tavangar M; Zohri Z; Sheikhnezhad H; Shahbeig S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):867-873. PubMed ID: 28989122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of strong tooth-bleaching with 38% hydrogen peroxide on marginal seal of dental restorations using self-etch and total-etch adhesives.
    Piemjai M; Lenglerdphol S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 30(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 29243397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Francci CE; Perdigão J
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Protective effect of resin coating on the microleakage of Class V restorations following treatment with carbamide peroxide in vitro.
    Yu H; Li Q; Attin T; Wang Y
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 21180002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Leakage testing for different adhesive systems and composites to permanent teeth.
    Bolgul BS; Ayna B; Simsek I; Celenk S; Seker O; Kilinc G
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):787-791. PubMed ID: 28791970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of the number of coats of simplified adhesive systems on microleakage of dentin-bordered composite restorations.
    Harada TS; Pazinatto FB; Wang L; Atta MT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 17091138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of marginal leakage after mechanical fatigue cycling of composite inlays luted with different cements.
    Melilli D; Cumbo EM; Baldissara P; Wandscher VF; Valandro LF; Gallina G; Pizzo G
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):51-55. PubMed ID: 29964249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage scores to determine the adhesive potential of universal bonding systems.
    Kearns JO; Barry JG; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):970-6. PubMed ID: 24943379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.