BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29604084)

  • 1. Behavioral decoding of working memory items inside and outside the focus of attention.
    Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):256-267. PubMed ID: 29604084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.
    Dowd EW; Pearson JM; Egner T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 28155212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory contents revive the neglected, but suppress the inhibited.
    Han SW
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():116-21. PubMed ID: 26355831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016).
    Frătescu M; Van Moorselaar D; Mathôt S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 31309532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
    Bahle B; Beck VM; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):992-1011. PubMed ID: 29629781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory.
    LaRocque JJ; Riggall AC; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4881-4890. PubMed ID: 27702811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Contralateral Delay Activity Reflect Working Memory Storage or the Current Focus of Spatial Attention within Visual Working Memory?
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 28(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27458749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.
    Han SW
    Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28871460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence that top-down knowledge controls working memory processing for subsequent visual search.
    Kawashima T; Matsumoto E
    Neuroreport; 2016 Mar; 27(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 26872100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning changes the attentional status of prospective memories.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1483-1490. PubMed ID: 26892228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.