These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29604459)

  • 1. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural generators of the frequency-following response elicited to stimuli of low and high frequency: A magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study.
    Gorina-Careta N; Kurkela JLO; Hämäläinen J; Astikainen P; Escera C
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117866. PubMed ID: 33592244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners.
    Kulasingham JP; Brodbeck C; Presacco A; Kuchinsky SE; Anderson S; Simon JZ
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 222():117291. PubMed ID: 32835821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
    Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Topographic recordings of auditory evoked potentials to speech: subcortical and cortical responses.
    Bellier L; Bouchet P; Jeanvoine A; Valentin O; Thai-Van H; Caclin A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Apr; 52(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 25329609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G; Powers L
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG.
    Coffey EB; Herholz SC; Chepesiuk AM; Baillet S; Zatorre RJ
    Nat Commun; 2016 Mar; 7():11070. PubMed ID: 27009409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneously-evoked auditory potentials (SEAP): A new method for concurrent measurement of cortical and subcortical auditory-evoked activity.
    Slugocki C; Bosnyak D; Trainor LJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():30-42. PubMed ID: 28043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.
    Coffey EBJ; Musacchia G; Zatorre RJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):830-838. PubMed ID: 28123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain mapping of auditory steady-state responses: A broad view of cortical and subcortical sources.
    Farahani ED; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Feb; 42(3):780-796. PubMed ID: 33166050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Recorded Brainstem versus Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Speech.
    Bidelman GM; Pousson M; Dugas C; Fehrenbach A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):164-174. PubMed ID: 29401063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Case studies in neuroscience: subcortical origins of the frequency-following response.
    White-Schwoch T; Anderson S; Krizman J; Nicol T; Kraus N
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):844-848. PubMed ID: 31268800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners.
    Zhang X; Gong Q
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():255-264. PubMed ID: 27956352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings reveal vocal pitch elicited cortical gamma oscillations in young and older adults.
    Ross B; Tremblay KL; Alain C
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 204():116253. PubMed ID: 31600592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional Modulation of the Cortical Contribution to the Frequency-Following Response Evoked by Continuous Speech.
    Schüller A; Schilling A; Krauss P; Rampp S; Reichenbach T
    J Neurosci; 2023 Nov; 43(44):7429-7440. PubMed ID: 37793908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults.
    Bidelman GM; Price CN; Shen D; Arnott SR; Alain C
    Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 382():107795. PubMed ID: 31479953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dichotic phase effects on frequency following responses reveal phase variant and invariant harmonic distortion products.
    Gnanateja GN; Maruthy S
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():84-99. PubMed ID: 31212114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.