These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29604516)

  • 1. Market penetration of intersection AEB: Characterizing avoided and residual straight crossing path accidents.
    Sander U; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():178-188. PubMed ID: 29604516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes.
    Sander U; Lubbe N; Pietzsch S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S119-S125. PubMed ID: 31381448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The potential of clustering methods to define intersection test scenarios: Assessing real-life performance of AEB.
    Sander U; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():1-11. PubMed ID: 29355748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for cyclists: Effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities.
    Jeppsson H; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105538. PubMed ID: 32470821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying Vision Zero: Crash avoidance in rural and motorway accident scenarios by combination of ACC, AEB, and LKS projected to German accident occurrence.
    Stark L; Düring M; Schoenawa S; Maschke JE; Do CM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S126-S132. PubMed ID: 31381430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder.
    Zhao Y; Ito D; Mizuno K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 30822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method for predicting crash configurations using counterfactual simulations and real-world data.
    Leledakis A; Lindman M; Östh J; Wågström L; Davidsson J; Jakobsson L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105932. PubMed ID: 33341681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real life safety benefits of increasing brake deceleration in car-to-pedestrian accidents: Simulation of Vacuum Emergency Braking.
    Jeppsson H; Östling M; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():311-320. PubMed ID: 29257980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Opportunities and limitations for intersection collision intervention-A study of real world 'left turn across path' accidents.
    Sander U
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):342-355. PubMed ID: 28043070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Injury mitigation estimates for an intersection driver assistance system in straight crossing path crashes in the United States.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S9-S17. PubMed ID: 28323447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France.
    Chajmowicz H; Saadé J; Cuny S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S20-S25. PubMed ID: 31750740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating automated emergency braking performance in simulated car-to-two-wheeler crashes in China: A comparison between C-NCAP tests and in-depth crash data.
    Sui B; Lubbe N; Bärgman J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106229. PubMed ID: 34225169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.