These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29604682)

  • 1. Cognitive disruption by noise-vocoded speech stimuli: Effects of spectral variation.
    Senan TU; Jelfs S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1407. PubMed ID: 29604682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Memory disruption by irrelevant noise-vocoded speech: Effects of native language and the number of frequency bands.
    Ellermeier W; Kattner F; Ueda K; Doumoto K; Nakajima Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1561-9. PubMed ID: 26428793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
    Ueda K; Araki T; Nakajima Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Irrelevant speech effect under stationary and adaptive masking conditions.
    Park M; Kohlrausch A; van Leest A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):1970-81. PubMed ID: 23967930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of speech fidelity in the irrelevant sound effect: Insights from noise-vocoded speech backgrounds.
    Dorsi J; Viswanathan N; Rosenblum LD; Dias JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2152-2161. PubMed ID: 30226434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectral restoration of speech: intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps.
    Warren RM; Hainsworth KR; Brubaker BS; Bashford JA; Healy EW
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 9055622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal-envelope constancy of speech in rooms and the perceptual weighting of frequency bands.
    Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2777-88. PubMed ID: 22087906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Algorithmic modeling of the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) by the hearing sensation fluctuation strength.
    Schlittmeier SJ; Weissgerber T; Kerber S; Fastl H; Hellbrück J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):194-203. PubMed ID: 22038665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of the irrelevant speech effect: Changes in spectrum and envelope.
    Schlittenlacher J; Staab K; Çelebi Ö; Samel A; Ellermeier W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3625. PubMed ID: 31255159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectral density affects the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech: Implications for cochlear implant simulations.
    Rosen S; Zhang Y; Speers K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL318-23. PubMed ID: 26428833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):844-55. PubMed ID: 25698018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of noise-vocoded tone complexes: A time domain analysis based on an auditory filterbank model.
    Shofner WP; Morris H; Mills M
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():1-16. PubMed ID: 30005269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.
    Bashford JA; Warren RM; Brown CA
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 8935895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relation between the intelligibility of irrelevant speech and cognitive performance-A revised model based on laboratory studies.
    Haapakangas A; Hongisto V; Liebl A
    Indoor Air; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1130-1146. PubMed ID: 32735743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.