These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29604686)

  • 1. Relationship between speech-evoked neural responses and perception of speech in noise in older adults.
    Mai G; Tuomainen J; Howell P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1333. PubMed ID: 29604686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory Brainstem Representation of the Voice Pitch Contours in the Resolved and Unresolved Components of Mandarin Tones.
    Peng F; McKay CM; Mao D; Hou W; Innes-Brown H
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():820. PubMed ID: 30505262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The possible role of early-stage phase-locked neural activities in speech-in-noise perception in human adults across age and hearing loss.
    Mai G; Howell P
    Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 427():108647. PubMed ID: 36436293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Phase-Locking Deficits on Speech Recognition in Older Adults With Presbycusis.
    Hao W; Wang Q; Li L; Qiao Y; Gao Z; Ni D; Shang Y
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2018; 10():397. PubMed ID: 30574084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings reveal vocal pitch elicited cortical gamma oscillations in young and older adults.
    Ross B; Tremblay KL; Alain C
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 204():116253. PubMed ID: 31600592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation of phase-locked neural responses to speech during different arousal states is age-dependent.
    Mai G; Schoof T; Howell P
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():734-744. PubMed ID: 30703520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.
    Swaminathan J; Heinz MG
    J Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 32(5):1747-56. PubMed ID: 22302814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech: Amplitude Modulation Versus Amplitude Plus Frequency Modulation.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Luo X
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 31246660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal combination of neural temporal envelope and fine structure cues to explain speech identification in background noise.
    Moon IJ; Won JH; Park MH; Ives DT; Nie K; Heinz MG; Lorenzi C; Rubinstein JT
    J Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 34(36):12145-54. PubMed ID: 25186758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural representation of interaural correlation in human auditory brainstem: Comparisons between temporal-fine structure and envelope.
    Wang Q; Lu H; Wu Z; Li L
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():165-173. PubMed ID: 29853322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of background noise on inter-trial phase coherence and auditory N1-P2 responses to speech stimuli.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():113-9. PubMed ID: 26276419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-Following Response to Steady-State Vowel in Quiet and Background Noise Among Marching Band Participants With Normal Hearing.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3):719-736. PubMed ID: 35944059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech Auditory Brainstem Response through hearing aid stimulation.
    Bellier L; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Bouchet P; Caclin A; Thai-Van H
    Hear Res; 2015 Jul; 325():49-54. PubMed ID: 25828076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.