These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29605124)

  • 1. Application of newly developed Fluoro-QC software for image quality evaluation in cardiac X-ray systems.
    Oliveira M; Lopez G; Geambastiani P; Ubeda C
    Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):e44-e47. PubMed ID: 29605124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology systems. A national survey in Chile.
    Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Leyton F; Martinez LC; Oyarzun C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):429-38. PubMed ID: 21148589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.
    Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Zuguchi M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 27455503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of cassette-based digital radiography detectors using standardized image quality metrics: AAPM TG-150 Draft Image Detector Tests.
    Li G; Greene TC; Nishino TK; Willis CE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):391-417. PubMed ID: 27685102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY: A PHANTOM-BASED STUDY.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Gatzounis GD; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30508126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology.
    Vano E; Ubeda C; Leyton F; Miranda P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4049-62. PubMed ID: 18612174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward standardized quantitative image quality (IQ) assessment in computed tomography (CT): A comprehensive framework for automated and comparative IQ analysis based on ICRU Report 87.
    Pahn G; Skornitzke S; Schlemmer HP; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):104-15. PubMed ID: 26520485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
    Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the stability of image quality parameters of Elekta X-ray volume imager and iViewGT imaging systems.
    Stanley DN; Rasmussen K; Kirby N; Papanikolaou N; Gutiérrez AN
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 29520938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a universal medical X-ray imaging phantom prototype.
    Groenewald A; Groenewald WA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):356-365. PubMed ID: 27929508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial application of a geometric QA tool for integrated MV and kV imaging systems on three image guided radiotherapy systems.
    Mao W; Speiser M; Medin P; Papiez L; Solberg T; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2335-41. PubMed ID: 21776767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moving segments region of interest attenuator for x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Sassi SA; Britten AJ
    Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9949394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose and image quality for adult interventional cardiology in Chile: a national survey.
    Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Leyton F; Valenzuela E; Oyarzun C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):90-3. PubMed ID: 21743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AUTOMATED QC FOR INTERVENTIONAL SYSTEMS AND MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Visanuyanont T; Gluchowski P; Hillberg E; Moberg T; Svalkvist A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Oct; 195(3-4):399-406. PubMed ID: 33912965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of image quality and patient exposure in fluoroscopy using a phantom: Is there any clinical relevance?
    Tsalafoutas IA; Tsapaki V; Triantopoulou I
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 May; 138():109607. PubMed ID: 33667936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of reduction of the pulse rates of fluoroscopy and CINE-acquisition on x-ray dose and angiographic image quality during invasive cardiovascular procedures.
    Pyne CT; Gadey G; Jeon C; Piemonte T; Waxman S; Resnic F
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 25006174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of x-ray pulse parameters on the image quality for moving objects in digital cardiac imaging.
    Guibelalde E; Vano E; Vaquero F; González L
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2819-25. PubMed ID: 15543789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.