BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29605305)

  • 1. Direct and indirect effects of waste management policies on household waste behaviour: The case of Sweden.
    Andersson C; Stage J
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():19-27. PubMed ID: 29605305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concept of sustainable waste management in the city of Zagreb: Towards the implementation of circular economy approach.
    Ribić B; Voća N; Ilakovac B
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Feb; 67(2):241-259. PubMed ID: 27650014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generation, collection and transportation, disposal and recycling of kitchen waste: a case study in Shanghai.
    An Y; Li G; Wu W; Huang J; He W; Zhu H
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Mar; 32(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 24522775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Waste hierarchy index for circular economy in waste management.
    Pires A; Martinho G
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():298-305. PubMed ID: 31351615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introduction of the circular economy within developing regions: A comparative analysis of advantages and opportunities for waste valorization.
    Ferronato N; Rada EC; Gorritty Portillo MA; Cioca LI; Ragazzi M; Torretta V
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jan; 230():366-378. PubMed ID: 30293021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current status of circularity for aluminum from household waste in Austria.
    Warrings R; Fellner J
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():217-224. PubMed ID: 29475615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Destined for indecision? A critical analysis of waste management practices in England from 1996 to 2013.
    Farmer TD; Shaw PJ; Williams ID
    Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():266-76. PubMed ID: 25771762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing recycling versus incineration of key materials in municipal waste: The importance of efficient energy recovery and transport distances.
    Merrild H; Larsen AW; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):1009-18. PubMed ID: 22265239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A problem unstuck? Evaluating the effectiveness of sticker prompts for encouraging household food waste recycling behaviour.
    Shearer L; Gatersleben B; Morse S; Smyth M; Hunt S
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():164-172. PubMed ID: 27697423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pay as you throw: strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden.
    Dahlén L; Lagerkvist A
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jan; 30(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19833498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience.
    Bernstad A
    Waste Manag; 2014 Jul; 34(7):1317-23. PubMed ID: 24780762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste.
    Rousta K; Bolton K; Lundin M; Dahlén L
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():22-30. PubMed ID: 25817721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Life cycle assessment of a household solid waste source separation programme: a Swedish case study.
    Bernstad A; la Cour Jansen J; Aspegren H
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Oct; 29(10):1027-42. PubMed ID: 21824984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New developments in waste management in the Netherlands.
    Goorhuis M; Reus P; Nieuwenhuis E; Spanbroek N; Sol M; van Rijn J
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):67-77. PubMed ID: 22993136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive modelling as a tool for effective municipal waste management policy at different territorial levels.
    Rosecký M; Šomplák R; Slavík J; Kalina J; Bulková G; Bednář J
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 291():112584. PubMed ID: 33930635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inconsistent pathways of household waste.
    Dahlén L; Berg H; Lagerkvist A; Berg PE
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1798-806. PubMed ID: 19167877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A holistic life cycle analysis of waste management scenarios at increasing source segregation intensity: the case of an Italian urban area.
    Di Maria F; Micale C
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2382-92. PubMed ID: 25008299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost recovery of municipal solid waste management in small cities of inland China.
    Ren X; Hu S
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Apr; 32(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 24633554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Sweden.
    Dahlén L; Vukicevic S; Meijer JE; Lagerkvist A
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(10):1298-305. PubMed ID: 17010597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards sustainable consumption: A socio-economic analysis of household waste recycling outcomes in Hong Kong.
    Lo AY; Liu S
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 214():416-425. PubMed ID: 29547846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.