These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29605934)

  • 41. 3D Computational Modeling of Proteins Using Sparse Paramagnetic NMR Data.
    Pilla KB; Otting G; Huber T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1526():3-21. PubMed ID: 27896733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Automated de novo phasing and model building of coiled-coil proteins.
    Rämisch S; Lizatović R; André I
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2015 Mar; 71(Pt 3):606-14. PubMed ID: 25760609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta.
    Wang RY; Song Y; Barad BA; Cheng Y; Fraser JS; DiMaio F
    Elife; 2016 Sep; 5():. PubMed ID: 27669148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Solid-state NMR: An emerging technique in structural biology of self-assemblies.
    Habenstein B; Loquet A
    Biophys Chem; 2016 Mar; 210():14-26. PubMed ID: 26234527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A unified convention for biological assemblies with helical symmetry.
    Tsai CJ; Nussinov R
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2011 Aug; 67(Pt 8):716-28. PubMed ID: 21795813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Multiple helical conformations of the helix-turn-helix region revealed by NOE-restrained MD simulations of tryptophan aporepressor, TrpR.
    Harish B; Swapna GV; Kornhaber GJ; Montelione GT; Carey J
    Proteins; 2017 Apr; 85(4):731-740. PubMed ID: 28120439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Molecular dynamics simulations of peptides and proteins with a continuum electrostatic model based on screened Coulomb potentials.
    Hassan SA; Mehler EL; Zhang D; Weinstein H
    Proteins; 2003 Apr; 51(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 12596268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Protein structure prediction: combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data.
    Latek D; Ekonomiuk D; Kolinski A
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jul; 28(10):1668-76. PubMed ID: 17342709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Analysis of the stability of hemoglobin S double strands.
    Mu XQ; Makowski L; Magdoff-Fairchild B
    Biophys J; 1998 Jan; 74(1):655-68. PubMed ID: 9449367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Selective refinement and selection of near-native models in protein structure prediction.
    Zhang J; Barz B; Zhang J; Xu D; Kosztin I
    Proteins; 2015 Oct; 83(10):1823-35. PubMed ID: 26214389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effective protein model structure refinement by loop modeling and overall relaxation.
    Lee GR; Heo L; Seok C
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1():293-301. PubMed ID: 26172288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Information-driven modeling of large macromolecular assemblies using NMR data.
    van Ingen H; Bonvin AM
    J Magn Reson; 2014 Apr; 241():103-14. PubMed ID: 24656083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Efficient modeling of symmetric protein aggregates from NMR data.
    Bardiaux B; van Rossum BJ; Nilges M; Oschkinat H
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2012 Jul; 51(28):6916-9. PubMed ID: 22653848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modeling and Structure Determination of Homo-Oligomeric Proteins: An Overview of Challenges and Current Approaches.
    Gaber A; Pavšič M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 34445785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Construction of molecular assemblies via docking: modeling of tetramers with D2 symmetry.
    Berchanski A; Eisenstein M
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):817-29. PubMed ID: 14635124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessing protein conformational sampling and structural stability via de novo design and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Cunha KC; Rusu VH; Viana IF; Marques ET; Dhalia R; Lins RD
    Biopolymers; 2015 Jun; 103(6):351-61. PubMed ID: 25677872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison between self-guided Langevin dynamics and molecular dynamics simulations for structure refinement of protein loop conformations.
    Olson MA; Chaudhury S; Lee MS
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Nov; 32(14):3014-22. PubMed ID: 21793008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Protein structure modeling and refinement by global optimization in CASP12.
    Hong SH; Joung I; Flores-Canales JC; Manavalan B; Cheng Q; Heo S; Kim JY; Lee SY; Nam M; Joo K; Lee IH; Lee SJ; Lee J
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():122-135. PubMed ID: 29159837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.
    Das R; Baker D
    Annu Rev Biochem; 2008; 77():363-82. PubMed ID: 18410248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Multipass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta.
    Yarov-Yarovoy V; Schonbrun J; Baker D
    Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 16372357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.