137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29608389)
1. One-tailed asymptotic inferences for the difference of proportions: Analysis of 97 methods of inference.
Hernández MÁ; Andrés AM; Tejedor IH
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1090-1104. PubMed ID: 29608389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-tailed asymptotic inferences for the odds ratio in cross-sectional studies: evaluation of fifteen old and new methods of inference.
Andrés AM; García JMT; Moreno FG
J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):900-915. PubMed ID: 32419581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An approximate unconditional test of non-inferiority between two proportions.
Kang SH; Chen JJ
Stat Med; 2000 Aug; 19(16):2089-100. PubMed ID: 10931513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints.
Chen YM; Weng YT; Dong X; Tsong Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27906607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating a companion test into the noninferiority design of medical device trials.
Lu NT; Xu Y; Yang Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):143-150. PubMed ID: 29985744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferences about a linear combination of proportions.
Martín Andrés A; Alvarez Hernández M; Herranz Tejedor I
Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):369-87. PubMed ID: 20223780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confidence intervals for proportion ratios of stratified correlated bilateral data.
Zhuang T; Tian GL; Ma CX
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):203-225. PubMed ID: 30010492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A New Class of Robust Two-Sample Wald-Type Tests.
Ghosh A; Martin N; Basu A; Pardo L
Int J Biostat; 2018 Jul; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 30024852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral Wilms' tumor. A case report and review of the literature.
Vats TS; Seeman J
J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Dec; 83(12):631-3. PubMed ID: 6296248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fully specified bootstrap confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions based on the median unbiased estimator.
Lin Y; Newcombe RG; Lipsitz S; Carter RE
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(23):2876-90. PubMed ID: 19691015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new noninferiority test for independent dichotomous variables based on a shrinkage proportion estimator.
Almendra-Arao F
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):157-69. PubMed ID: 24836379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-inferiority versus superiority drug claims: the (not so) subtle distinction.
Ganju J; Rom D
Trials; 2017 Jun; 18(1):278. PubMed ID: 28619049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-arm noninferiority trials with a prespecified margin for inference of the difference in the proportions of binary endpoints.
Hida E; Tango T
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):774-89. PubMed ID: 23799810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Power and sample size determination for noninferiority trials using an exact method.
Chan IS
J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 12477069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New tests for null hypothesis of non unity ratio of proportions.
Koti KM
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):229-45. PubMed ID: 17365220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of two binomial proportions in noninferiority confirmatory trials.
Lakkis H; Lakkis A
Pharm Stat; 2024; 23(2):257-275. PubMed ID: 38083906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidence interval of risk difference by different statistical methods and its impact on the study conclusion in antibiotic non-inferiority trials.
Bai AD; Komorowski AS; Lo CKL; Tandon P; Li XX; Mokashi V; Cvetkovic A; Findlater A; Liang L; Tomlinson G; Loeb M; Mertz D;
Trials; 2021 Oct; 22(1):708. PubMed ID: 34656155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.
Schaarschmidt F; Biesheuvel E; Hothorn LA
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):292-310. PubMed ID: 19212881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exact one-sided confidence limits for Cohen's kappa as a measurement of agreement.
Shan G; Wang W
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):615-632. PubMed ID: 25288510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of case-cohort designs with binary outcomes: Improving efficiency using whole-cohort auxiliary information.
Noma H; Tanaka S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):691-706. PubMed ID: 25348675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
