158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29608450)
1. Does Day of Surgery Affect Hospital Length of Stay and Charges Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Hijji FY; Narain AS; Haws BE; Khechen B; Kudaravalli KT; Yom KH; Singh K
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Jun; 31(5):E291-E295. PubMed ID: 29608450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diabetes Does Not Increase Complications, Length of Stay, or Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Narain AS; Haws BE; Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Block AM; Lamoutte EH; Karmarkar SS; Singh K
Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Aug; 33(7):E307-E311. PubMed ID: 32433099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Complications, Length of Stay, and Direct Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Khechen B; Haws BE; Bawa MS; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Lalehzarian SP; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(5):363-368. PubMed ID: 30095793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.
Whitecloud TS; Roesch WW; Ricciardi JE
J Spinal Disord; 2001 Apr; 14(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 11285420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-utility of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Phan K; Hogan JA; Mobbs RJ
Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24(11):2503-13. PubMed ID: 26195079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
Tian Y; Liu X
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Preoperative Medications on Length of Stay, Inpatient Pain, and Narcotics Consumption After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Haws BE; Khechen B; Patel DV; Bawa MS; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Wiggins AB; Singh K
Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Feb; 32(1):E37-E42. PubMed ID: 30234567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Revision Surgery for Recurrent Herniation After Microendoscopic Discectomy.
Yao Y; Zhang H; Wu J; Liu H; Zhang Z; Tang Y; Zhou Y
World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():89-95. PubMed ID: 27919762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
