BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29608450)

  • 21. Is Body Mass Index a Risk Factor for Revision Procedures After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Narain AS; Hijji FY; Bohl DD; Yom KH; Kudaravalli KT; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):E85-E91. PubMed ID: 28538081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost analysis of anterior-posterior circumferential fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Andres TM; Park JJ; Ricart Hoffiz PA; McHugh BJ; Warren DT; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 23353002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center.
    Wang J; Zhou Y
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2078-84. PubMed ID: 24361997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.
    Seng C; Siddiqui MA; Wong KP; Zhang K; Yeo W; Tan SB; Yue WM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):2049-55. PubMed ID: 23963015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.
    Virdee JS; Nadig A; Anagnostopoulos G; George KJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 31(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 27331649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the Total and Hidden Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Zhang H; Chen ZX; Sun ZM; Jiang C; Ni WF; Lin Y; Wu YS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 107():739-743. PubMed ID: 28844914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Three Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Methods for Revision Surgery for Recurrent Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.
    Yao Y; Zhang H; Wu J; Liu H; Zhang Z; Tang Y; Zhou Y
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 100():641-647.e1. PubMed ID: 28153616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
    de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Analysis of Inpatient Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Costs.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Sep; 43(18):1307-1312. PubMed ID: 29462060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
    Goz V; Weinreb JH; Schwab F; Lafage V; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2019-27. PubMed ID: 24333459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction.
    Scheer JK; Auffinger B; Wong RH; Lam SK; Lawton CD; Nixon AT; Dahdaleh NS; Smith ZA; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 84(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 25753232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Navigation Makes Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Less Invasive.
    Wang Y; Hu Y; Liu H; Li C; Li H; Yi X
    Orthopedics; 2016 Sep; 39(5):e857-62. PubMed ID: 27248336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
    Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).
    Lee KH; Yeo W; Soeharno H; Yue WM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):E234-40. PubMed ID: 24513660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predictive factors of hospital stay in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation.
    Siemionow K; Pelton MA; Hoskins JA; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(24):2046-54. PubMed ID: 22576071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Witham TF; Aaronson OS; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 21506066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.