209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29608574)
21. Porous polymethylmethacrylate as bone substitute in the craniofacial area.
Bruens ML; Pieterman H; de Wijn JR; Vaandrager JM
J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 12544223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Induction of a barrier membrane to facilitate reconstruction of massive segmental diaphyseal bone defects: an ovine model.
Viateau V; Guillemin G; Calando Y; Logeart D; Oudina K; Sedel L; Hannouche D; Bousson V; Petite H
Vet Surg; 2006 Jul; 35(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 16842289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Propolis extract a new reinforcement material in improving bone healing: An in vivo study.
Meimandi-Parizi A; Oryan A; Sayahi E; Bigham-Sadegh A
Int J Surg; 2018 Aug; 56():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reconstruction of radial bone defect in rat by calcium silicate biomaterials.
Oryan A; Alidadi S
Life Sci; 2018 May; 201():45-53. PubMed ID: 29596919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate on healing of intercalary cortical allografts in a canine model.
Straw RC; Powers BE; Withrow SJ; Cooper MF; Turner AS
J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):434-9. PubMed ID: 1569506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of bone cements on bone-screw interfaces in the third metacarpal and third metatarsal bones of horses.
Hirvinen LJ; Litsky AS; Samii VF; Weisbrode SE; Bertone AL
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Aug; 70(8):964-72. PubMed ID: 19645577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biocompatibility and bone formation with porous modified PMMA in normal and irradiated mandibular tissue.
Lye KW; Tideman H; Wolke JC; Merkx MA; Chin FK; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():100-9. PubMed ID: 22150934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bone healing study of alendronate combined with enoxaparin sodium bone cement in rabbits with bone defects.
Xiao Z; Fu D; Zhang L; Fan W; Shen X; Qi X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Sep; 17(1):431. PubMed ID: 36175933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of the induced membrane filled with syngeneic bone and regenerative cells on bone healing in a critical size defect model of the rat's femur.
Nau C; Simon S; Schaible A; Seebach C; Schröder K; Marzi I; Henrich D
Injury; 2018 Oct; 49(10):1721-1731. PubMed ID: 30244700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hydrogel-based Delivery of rhBMP-2 Improves Healing of Large Bone Defects Compared With Autograft.
Krishnan L; Priddy LB; Esancy C; Li MT; Stevens HY; Jiang X; Tran L; Rowe DW; Guldberg RE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2885-97. PubMed ID: 25917422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bioactive bone cements.
Harper EJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1998; 212(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 9612002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bone bonding ability and handling properties of a titania-polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) composite bioactive bone cement modified with a unique PMMA powder.
Fukuda C; Goto K; Imamura M; Neo M; Nakamura T
Acta Biomater; 2011 Oct; 7(10):3595-600. PubMed ID: 21704200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Masquelet technique for membrane induction and the healing of ovine critical sized segmental defects.
Christou C; Oliver RA; Yu Y; Walsh WR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114122. PubMed ID: 25461340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Alteration of Masquelet's induced membrane characteristics by different kinds of antibiotic enriched bone cement in a critical size defect model in the rat's femur.
Nau C; Seebach C; Trumm A; Schaible A; Kontradowitz K; Meier S; Buechner H; Marzi I; Henrich D
Injury; 2016 Feb; 47(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 26652225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Use of the Peptigel with Nanofibres in the Bone Defects Healing].
Srnec R; Divín R; Škorič M; Snášil R; Krbec M; Nečas A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(5):359-365. PubMed ID: 30383533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Attachment of PMMA cement to bone: force measurements in rats.
Skripitz R; Aspenberg P
Biomaterials; 1999 Feb; 20(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 10048407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A 12 month in vivo study on the response of bone to a hydroxyapatite-polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty composite.
Itokawa H; Hiraide T; Moriya M; Fujimoto M; Nagashima G; Suzuki R; Fujimoto T
Biomaterials; 2007 Nov; 28(33):4922-7. PubMed ID: 17707904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the biphasic calcium composite (BCC), a novel bone cement, in a minipig model of pulmonary embolism.
Qin Y; Ye J; Wang P; Gao L; Jiang J; Wang S; Shen H
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2016; 27(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 26674994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bone Response to Porous Poly(methyl methacrylate) Cement Loaded with Hydroxyapatite Particles in a Rabbit Mandibular Model.
Sa Y; Yu N; Wolke JGC; Chanchareonsook N; Goh BT; Wang Y; Yang F; Jansen JA
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2017 May; 23(5):262-273. PubMed ID: 28372521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance of vertebral cancellous bone augmented with compliant PMMA under dynamic loads.
Boger A; Bohner M; Heini P; Schwieger K; Schneider E
Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1688-93. PubMed ID: 18678533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
