448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29609046)
1. A novel technique for cervical gastro-oesophageal anastomosis during minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
Wang ZQ; Jiang YQ; Xu W; Cai HR; Zhang Z; Yin Z; Zhang Q
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():221-229. PubMed ID: 29609046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.
Liu YJ; Fan J; He HH; Zhu SS; Chen QL; Cao RH
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021025. PubMed ID: 30181184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of oesophageal flap valvuloplasty and wrapping suturing technique in preventing postoperative complications after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.
Liu QX; Deng XF; Wang JS; Hou B; Li JM; Min JX; Dai JG
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1355-60. PubMed ID: 24835379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Liu H; Shan L; Wang J; Zhai R; Zhu Y; Yao F
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):891-901. PubMed ID: 36038647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.
Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Major complications of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy using the purse string-stapled anastomotic technique in 215 patients with oesophageal carcinoma.
Kang N; Zhang R; Ge W; Si P; Jiang M; Huang Y; Fang Y; Yao L; Wu K
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Nov; 27(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 29718251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer.
Gooszen JAH; Goense L; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI
Br J Surg; 2018 Apr; 105(5):552-560. PubMed ID: 29412450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy.
Mao CY; Yang YS; Yuan Y; Hu WP; Zhao YF; Hu Y; Che GW; Chen LQ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 26(12):4062-4069. PubMed ID: 31313034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M
World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of the stapled suture with the manual suture in the application of minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Wang F; Liu S; Wang J; Chen X; Zheng Q; Wang Z; Xu J; Chen S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):881-3. PubMed ID: 25273655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.
Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
