181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29609058)
1. Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents.
Katilius E; Carmel AB; Koss H; O'Connell D; Smith BC; Sanders GM; LaBerge GS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():9-13. PubMed ID: 29609058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expedited, chemically enhanced sperm cell recovery from cotton swabs for rape kit analysis.
Norris JV; Manning K; Linke SJ; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):800-5. PubMed ID: 17524064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
Nori DV; McCord BR
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective study on the transfer, persistence and recovery of sperm and epithelial cells in samples collected in sexual assault casework.
Fonneløp AE; Johannessen H; Heen G; Molland K; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102153. PubMed ID: 31505370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automation of the Differential Digestion Process of Sexual Assault Evidence.
Wong H; Mihalovich J
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 30044890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time since intercourse (TSI) data from a large-scale casework study of penile-vaginal penetration allegations using Sperm Elution™.
Owers R; Davidson G; McDonald A; Morgan R; O'Rourke P
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():10-13. PubMed ID: 29705584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic trapping of sperm cells from mock sexual assault samples.
Clark CP; Xu K; Scott O; Hickey J; Tsuei AC; Jackson K; Landers JP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():42-49. PubMed ID: 30954892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Capillary zone electrophoresis separation and collection of spermatozoa for the forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Wright SN; Huge BJ; Dovichi NJ
Electrophoresis; 2020 Aug; 41(15):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 32453860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of hematoxylin reagent for sperm cell separation in sexual crime evidence.
Kim JY; Kim MI; Lee HH; Kim HL; Lee EJ; Lee YH; Hwang IK; Chun BW; Kang PW
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110114. PubMed ID: 31901461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A confirmatory test for sperm in sexual assault samples using a microfluidic-integrated cell phone imaging system.
Deshmukh S; Inci F; Karaaslan MG; Ogut MG; Duncan D; Klevan L; Duncan G; Demirci U
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102313. PubMed ID: 32570000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Filtration based DNA preparation for sexual assault cases.
Garvin AM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1084-7. PubMed ID: 14535671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution of sexual offense samples using the DEPArray™ system.
Williamson VR; Laris TM; Romano R; Marciano MA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():265-276. PubMed ID: 29602061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced elution of sperm from cotton swabs via enzymatic digestion for rape kit analysis.
Voorhees JC; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
J Forensic Sci; 2006 May; 51(3):574-9. PubMed ID: 16696704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developmental validation of an efficient differential separation method incorporating the i-sep
White TJ; Rye MS; Tay JW
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1679-1689. PubMed ID: 35373351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
