197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29609812)
1. Correlation between gamma passing rate and complexity of IMRT plan due to MLC position errors.
Wang Y; Pang X; Feng L; Wang H; Bai Y
Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():112-120. PubMed ID: 29609812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.
Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the modulation degrees of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans.
Park SY; Kim JI; Chun M; Ahn H; Park JM
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):244. PubMed ID: 30545396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of collimator angle, couch angle, and starting phase on motion-tracking dynamic conformal arc therapy (4D DCAT).
Xu Z; Yao R; Podgorsak MB; Wang IZ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):54-63. PubMed ID: 28730652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study on the effect of detector resolution on gamma index passing rate for VMAT and IMRT QA.
Woon W; Ravindran PB; Ekayanake P; S V; Lim YY; Khalid J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):230-248. PubMed ID: 29460465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3D and 2D gamma passing rate criteria for detection sensitivity to IMRT delivery errors.
Zhang D; Wang B; Zhang G; Ma C; Deng X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 19(4):230-238. PubMed ID: 29905004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IMRT QA and gamma comparisons: The impact of detector geometry, spatial sampling, and delivery technique on gamma comparison sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5367-5381. PubMed ID: 34036596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation Between Average Segment Width and Gamma Passing Rate as a Function of MLC Position Error in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.
Moon YM; Bae SI; Han MJ; Jeon W; Yu T; Choi CW; Kim JY
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211059937. PubMed ID: 34821195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IMRT QA: Selecting gamma criteria based on error detection sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1982. PubMed ID: 27036593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Description and evaluation of a new volumetric-modulated arc therapy plan complexity metric.
Li G; Jiang W; Li Y; Wang Q; Xiao J; Zhong R; Bai S
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 33353791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modulation indices and plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park JM; Kim JI; Park SY
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):12-22. PubMed ID: 31038843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
