106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29609817)
1. Comparison of CT-number parameterization models for stoichiometric CT calibration in proton therapy.
Ödén J; Zimmerman J; Poludniowski G
Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():42-49. PubMed ID: 29609817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revisiting the single-energy CT calibration for proton therapy treatment planning: a critical look at the stoichiometric method.
Gomà C; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235011. PubMed ID: 30474618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proton CT on biological phantoms for x-ray CT calibration in proton treatment planning.
Fogazzi E; Bruzzi M; D'Amato E; Farace P; Righetto R; Scaringella M; Scarpa M; Tommasino F; Civinini C
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 69(13):. PubMed ID: 38862001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A formulation of tissue- and water-equivalent materials using the stoichiometric analysis method for CT-number calibration in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Yohannes I; Kolditz D; Langner O; Kalender WA
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1173-90. PubMed ID: 22330195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration.
Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.
Schneider U; Pedroni E; Lomax A
Phys Med Biol; 1996 Jan; 41(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 8685250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial implementation of the conversion from the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density in tissue inhomogeneity corrections: an anthropomorphic phantom study of radiotherapy treatment planning.
Tsukihara M; Noto Y; Sasamoto R; Hayakawa T; Saito M
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1378-88. PubMed ID: 25735292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real patient data based cross verification of kilovoltage and megavoltage CT calibration for proton therapy.
Nishioka S; Park JH; Zou W; Zhang M; Yue NJ; Chen T
Phys Med; 2016 Feb; 32(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 26924472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of CBCT reconstruction and calibration for radiotherapy planning in the head and neck region - a phantom study.
Elstrøm UV; Olsen SR; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1114-24. PubMed ID: 24975372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of an MR-based multimodal method for molecular composition and proton stopping power ratio determination using
Marants R; Tattenberg S; Scholey J; Kaza E; Miao X; Benkert T; Magneson O; Fischer J; Vinas L; Niepel K; Bortfeld T; Landry G; Parodi K; Verburg J; Sudhyadhom A
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37463589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A simulation study on proton computed tomography (CT) stopping power accuracy using dual energy CT scans as benchmark.
Hansen DC; Seco J; Sørensen TS; Petersen JB; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F; Landry G
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1638-42. PubMed ID: 26219959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT.
Taasti VT; Petersen JB; Muren LP; Thygesen J; Hansen DC
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5547. PubMed ID: 27782721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical Note: CT calibration for proton treatment planning by cross-calibration with proton CT data.
Farace P; Tommasino F; Righetto R; Fracchiolla F; Scaringella M; Bruzzi M; Civinini C
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 33382083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stoichiometric CT number calibration using three-parameter fit model for ion therapy.
Nakao M; Hayata M; Ozawa S; Miura H; Yamada K; Kawahara D; Miki K; Nakashima T; Ochi Y; Tsuda S; Seido M; Morimoto Y; Kawakubo A; Nozaki H; Habara K; Nagata Y
Phys Med; 2022 Jul; 99():22-30. PubMed ID: 35605415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration.
Yang M; Zhu XR; Park PC; Titt U; Mohan R; Virshup G; Clayton JE; Dong L
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(13):4095-115. PubMed ID: 22678123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical Note: On the calculation of stopping-power ratio for stoichiometric calibration in proton therapy.
Ödén J; Zimmerman J; Bujila R; Nowik P; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5252-7. PubMed ID: 26328974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.
Doolan PJ; Testa M; Sharp G; Bentefour EH; Royle G; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(5):1901-17. PubMed ID: 25668437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simplified derivation of stopping power ratio in the human body from dual-energy CT data.
Saito M; Sagara S
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4179-4187. PubMed ID: 28556239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power.
Schaffner B; Pedroni E
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 43(6):1579-92. PubMed ID: 9651027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
