These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29610980)

  • 1. The role of the action context in object affordance.
    Zhao L
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 29610980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT).
    Azaad S; Laham SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Nov; 72(11):2605-2613. PubMed ID: 31066635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Keep away from danger: dangerous objects in dynamic and static situations.
    Anelli F; Nicoletti R; Bolzani R; Borghi AM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():344. PubMed ID: 23847512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?
    Iani C; Ferraro L; Maiorana NV; Gallese V; Rubichi S
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1363-1374. PubMed ID: 29627857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Character Cues Modulate the Affordance Effects during Danger Warning.
    Zhao L
    Span J Psychol; 2020 May; 23():e2. PubMed ID: 32436490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Automaticity of Affordance of Dangerous Object.
    Zhao L
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Nov; 19():E74. PubMed ID: 27806742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Visually Dangerous Information on Imitation in Children.
    Zhao L; Sang N
    J Mot Behav; 2020; 52(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 31451042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition.
    Xu S; Humphreys GW; Heinke D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1021-36. PubMed ID: 25961281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features.
    Girardi G; Lindemann O; Bekkering H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):330-40. PubMed ID: 20364922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motor inhibition associated with the affordance of briefly displayed objects.
    Vainio L; Hammaren L; Hausen M; Rekolainen E; Riskila S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1094-110. PubMed ID: 21279867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prominent role of perceptual salience in object discrimination: overt discrimination of graspable side does not activate grasping affordances.
    Pellicano A; Binkofski F
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 32036443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of attention in the affordance effect: can we afford to ignore it?
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S215-8. PubMed ID: 22806650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical bottom-up attentional factors in the handle orientation effect: asymmetric luminance transients and object-center eccentricity relative to fixation.
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1685-1705. PubMed ID: 32248290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is there a left hemispheric asymmetry for tool affordance processing?
    Proverbio AM; Azzari R; Adorni R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2690-701. PubMed ID: 24056296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When left feels right: asymmetry in the affordance effect.
    Janyan A; Slavcheva GV
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S199-202. PubMed ID: 22806648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The predictive mirror: interactions of mirror and affordance processes during action observation.
    Bach P; Bayliss AP; Tipper SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 21327353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of response type on affordance and spatial compatibility effects in human and object interactions.
    Demir P; Sandıkçı M; Demir E; Soyman E
    Br J Psychol; 2024 Nov; 115(4):787-808. PubMed ID: 39096300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reversing the affordance effect: negative stimulus-response compatibility observed with images of graspable objects.
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():287-91. PubMed ID: 26233530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.
    Ambrosecchia M; Marino BF; Gawryszewski LG; Riggio L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():283. PubMed ID: 26042018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.