BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29611211)

  • 1. A predictive probability interim design for phase II clinical trials with continuous endpoints.
    Liu M; Dressler EV
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):1960-1972. PubMed ID: 29611211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal futility stopping boundaries for binary endpoints.
    Freitag MM; Li X; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):80. PubMed ID: 38539108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An extension of Bayesian predictive sample size selection designs for monitoring efficacy and safety.
    Teramukai S; Daimon T; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):3029-39. PubMed ID: 26038148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Lee JJ; Liu DD
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(2):93-106. PubMed ID: 18375647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring futility and efficacy in phase II trials with Bayesian posterior distributions-A calibration approach.
    Kopp-Schneider A; Wiesenfarth M; Witt R; Edelmann D; Witt O; Abel U
    Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):488-502. PubMed ID: 30175405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An optimal Bayesian predictive probability design for phase II clinical trials with simple and complicated endpoints.
    Guo B; Liu S
    Biom J; 2020 Mar; 62(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 31402481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mixed response and time-to-event endpoints for multistage single-arm phase II design.
    Lai X; Zee BC
    Trials; 2015 Jun; 16():250. PubMed ID: 26037094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applications of Bayesian statistical methodology to clinical trial design: A case study of a phase 2 trial with an interim futility assessment in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
    Smith CL; Jin Y; Raddad E; McNearney TA; Ni X; Monteith D; Brown R; Deeg MA; Schnitzer T
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 30321909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A flexible multi-stage design for phase II oncology trials.
    Tan MT; Xiong X
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 22328328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal continuous-monitoring design of single-arm phase II trial based on the simulated annealing method.
    Chen N; Lee JJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 May; 35(1):170-8. PubMed ID: 23545075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
    Chen K; Shan M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designs for phase II trials allowing for a trade-off between response and toxicity.
    Conaway MR; Petroni GR
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1375-86. PubMed ID: 8962459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized two-stage design for phase II clinical trials based on a Bayesian predictive approach.
    Cellamare M; Sambucini V
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):1059-78. PubMed ID: 25545805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New statistical strategy for monitoring safety and efficacy in single-arm clinical trials.
    Thall PF; Simon RM; Estey EH
    J Clin Oncol; 1996 Jan; 14(1):296-303. PubMed ID: 8558211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.
    Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian adaptive dose selection procedure with an overdispersed count endpoint.
    Pozzi L; Schmidli H; Gasparini M; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):5008-27. PubMed ID: 24022748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-stage phase II oncology designs using short-term endpoints for early stopping.
    Kunz CU; Wason JM; Kieser M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1671-1683. PubMed ID: 26037529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
    Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive Designs with Discrete Test Statistics and Consideration of Overrunning.
    Schmidt R; Burkhardt B; Faldum A
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 26429500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of phase II methodologies for single-arm clinical trials with multiple endpoints in rare cancers: An example in Ewing's sarcoma.
    Dutton P; Love SB; Billingham L; Hassan AB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1451-1463. PubMed ID: 27587590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.