BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29611902)

  • 1. Development of a Quality Dashboard Utilizing Cancer Registry Data.
    Bisel D
    J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 29611902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Building Data Infrastructure to Evaluate and Improve Quality: The National Cancer Data Base and the Commission on Cancer's Quality Improvement Programs.
    Shulman LN; McCabe R; Gay G; Palis B; McKellar D
    J Oncol Pract; 2015 May; 11(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 25901051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Address at Diagnosis: Place Matters.
    Sherman RL
    J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(2):76-7. PubMed ID: 29611689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Big data infrastructure for cancer outcomes research: implications for the practicing oncologist.
    Meyer AM; Basch E
    J Oncol Pract; 2015 May; 11(3):207-8. PubMed ID: 25873058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Innovative Approach to Improve Completeness of Treatment and Other Key Data Elements in a Population-Based Cancer Registry: A15-Month Data Submission.
    Hsieh MC; Mumphrey B; Pareti L; Yi Y; Wu XC
    J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 29611688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing cancer registry data for comparative effectiveness research (CER) project: overview and methodology.
    Chen VW; Eheman CR; Johnson CJ; Hernandez MN; Rousseau D; Styles TS; West DW; Hsieh M; Hakenewerth AM; Celaya MO; Rycroft RK; Wike JM; Pearson M; Brockhouse J; Mulvihill LG; Zhang KB
    J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(3):103-12. PubMed ID: 25419602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparability and compatibility: issues in combining data from central cancer registries.
    Howe HL
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):29-34. PubMed ID: 10165385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential and challenges of patient-generated health data for high-quality cancer care.
    Chung AE; Basch EM
    J Oncol Pract; 2015 May; 11(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 25852139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data Quality at the Indiana State Cancer Registry: An Evaluation of Timeliness by Cancer Type and Year.
    Jabour AM; Dixon BE; Jones JF; Haggstrom DA
    J Registry Manag; 2016; 43(4):168-73. PubMed ID: 29595919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary Payer at DX: Issues with Collection and Assessment of Data Quality.
    Sherman RL; Williamson L; Andrews P; Kahn A
    J Registry Manag; 2016; 43(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 27556850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing clinical data: a cancer registries update.
    Watkins S
    J AHIMA; 1997; 68(7):22-5. PubMed ID: 10168978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SEER*Educate-Learn by Doing.
    Potts MS; Hafterson JL
    J Registry Manag; 2016; 43(2):96-7. PubMed ID: 27556848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-Registry Benchmarking of Data Quality: Lessons Learned.
    Stausberg J; Harkener S; Engel C; Finger R; Heinz C; Jenetzky E; Jersch P; Martin D; Rupp R; Schoenthaler M; Suwelack B; Wegner J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 May; 302():167-171. PubMed ID: 37203640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Early Bird Doesn't Always Get the Worm: Evaluation of 15-Month Resubmission of Abstracts to Utah Cancer Registry.
    Wigren K; McFadden S; Herget K; Huston L; Romney D; Sweeney C
    J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(2):80-1. PubMed ID: 29611691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cost of cancer registry operations: Impact of volume on cost per case for core and enhanced registry activities.
    Subramanian S; Tangka FK; Beebe MC; Trebino D; Weir HK; Babcock F
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Apr; 55():1-8. PubMed ID: 26702880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lessons learned from the Canadian cancer registry experience.
    MacIntyre M; MacKay C
    Healthc Manage Forum; 2018 Jan; 31(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 29264973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring the delivery of cancer care: Commission on Cancer and National Cancer Data Base.
    Williams RT; Stewart AK; Winchester DP
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2012 Jul; 21(3):377-88, vii. PubMed ID: 22583987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating Early Case Capture of Pediatric Cancers in Seven Central Cancer Registries in the United States, 2013.
    Puckett M; Neri A; Rohan E; Clerkin C; Underwood JM; Ryerson AB; Stewart SL
    Public Health Rep; 2016; 131(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 26843678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the quality of industry and occupation data at a central cancer registry.
    Armenti KR; Celaya MO; Cherala S; Riddle B; Schumacher PK; Rees JR
    Am J Ind Med; 2010 Oct; 53(10):995-1001. PubMed ID: 20860053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developing a Model Cancer Registry: The Sarah Cannon Model.
    Sheridan C; Etzold N; Reynolds J
    J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(2):87-8. PubMed ID: 29611903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.