These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29613815)

  • 1. Understanding Is Key: An Analysis of Factors Pertaining to Trust in a Real-World Automation System.
    Balfe N; Sharples S; Wilson JR
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):477-495. PubMed ID: 29613815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.
    Muir BM; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 8849495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influencing Trust for Human-Automation Collaborative Scheduling of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles.
    Clare AS; Cummings ML; Repenning NP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1208-18. PubMed ID: 26060238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transport safety and human factors in the era of automation: What can transport modes learn from each other?
    Papadimitriou E; Schneider C; Aguinaga Tello J; Damen W; Lomba Vrouenraets M; Ten Broeke A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105656. PubMed ID: 32629228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptance of Full Driving Automation: Personally Owned and Shared-Use Concepts.
    Motamedi S; Wang P; Zhang T; Chan CY
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):288-309. PubMed ID: 31469591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Effects of Demands on Hazard Detection Performance.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):474-487. PubMed ID: 30307760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trust Mediating Reliability-Reliance Relationship in Supervisory Control of Human-Swarm Interactions.
    Hussein A; Elsawah S; Abbass HA
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1237-1248. PubMed ID: 31590574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Redundant Automation Monitoring: Four Eyes Don't See More Than Two, if Everyone Turns a Blind Eye.
    Cymek DH
    Hum Factors; 2018 Nov; 60(7):902-921. PubMed ID: 29939767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Role of Trust as a Mediator Between System Characteristics and Response Behaviors.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Proaps AB; Madhavan P
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):947-58. PubMed ID: 25917611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vigilance and Automation Dependence in Operation of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS): A Simulation Study.
    Wohleber RW; Matthews G; Lin J; Szalma JL; Calhoun GL; Funke GJ; Chiu CP; Ruff HA
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):488-505. PubMed ID: 30265579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting human-machine trust: a replication study of Muir and Moray (1996) using a simulated pasteurizer plant task.
    Lee J; Yamani Y; Long SK; Unverricht J; Itoh M
    Ergonomics; 2021 Sep; 64(9):1132-1145. PubMed ID: 33818301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.
    Schaefer KE; Chen JY; Szalma JL; Hancock PA
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):377-400. PubMed ID: 27005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience.
    Chiou EK; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2023 Feb; 65(1):137-165. PubMed ID: 33906505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests.
    Körber M; Prasch L; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):305-323. PubMed ID: 29283269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial validation of the trust of automated systems test (TOAST).
    Wojton HM; Porter D; T Lane S; Bieber C; Madhavan P
    J Soc Psychol; 2020 Nov; 160(6):735-750. PubMed ID: 32297844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Near-Perfect Automation: Investigating Performance, Trust, and Visual Attention Allocation.
    Foroughi CK; Devlin S; Pak R; Brown NL; Sibley C; Coyne JT
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):546-561. PubMed ID: 34348511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.
    Hoff KA; Bashir M
    Hum Factors; 2015 May; 57(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 25875432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliance on Haptic Assistance Reflected in Haptic Cue Weighting.
    Gibo TL; Plaisier MA; Mugge W; Abbink DA
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019; 12(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 30106693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What's Driving Me? Exploration and Validation of a Hierarchical Personality Model for Trust in Automated Driving.
    Kraus J; Scholz D; Baumann M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Sep; 63(6):1076-1105. PubMed ID: 32633564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.