These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29613815)

  • 21. Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.
    Nordhoff S; Stapel J; He X; Gentner A; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260953. PubMed ID: 34932565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The More You Know: Trust Dynamics and Calibration in Highly Automated Driving and the Effects of Take-Overs, System Malfunction, and System Transparency.
    Kraus J; Scholz D; Stiegemeier D; Baumann M
    Hum Factors; 2020 Aug; 62(5):718-736. PubMed ID: 31233695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; Goodyear K; Lu L; O'Hara M; Lee MR; Parasuraman R; Krueger F
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):116-133. PubMed ID: 28146673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does automation trust evolve from a leap of faith? An analysis using a reprogrammed pasteurizer simulation task.
    Long SK; Lee J; Yamani Y; Unverricht J; Itoh M
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103674. PubMed ID: 35026680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Providing different levels of accuracy about the reliability of automation to a human operator: impact on human performance.
    Avril E
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):217-226. PubMed ID: 35451925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation.
    Yang XJ; Schemanske C; Searle C
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):862-878. PubMed ID: 34459266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Challenges to Human Drivers in Increasingly Automated Vehicles.
    Hancock PA; Kajaks T; Caird JK; Chignell MH; Mizobuchi S; Burns PC; Feng J; Fernie GR; Lavallière M; Noy IY; Redelmeier DA; Vrkljan BH
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):310-328. PubMed ID: 32022583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. User perceptions of automated Truck-Mounted attenuators: Implications on work zone safety.
    Pourfalatoun S; Miller EE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):413-418. PubMed ID: 34037505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM; Ilgen DR
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 18516832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dancing With Algorithms: Interaction Creates Greater Preference and Trust in Machine-Learned Behavior.
    Gutzwiller RS; Reeder J
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):854-867. PubMed ID: 32048883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Who's the real expert here? Pedigree's unique bias on trust between human and automated advisers.
    Pearson CJ; Geden M; Mayhorn CB
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102907. PubMed ID: 31422272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between automation trust and operator performance for the novice and expert in spacecraft rendezvous and docking (RVD).
    Niu J; Geng H; Zhang Y; Du X
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Sep; 71():1-8. PubMed ID: 29764609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The reliability and transparency bases of trust in human-swarm interaction: principles and implications.
    Hussein A; Elsawah S; Abbass HA
    Ergonomics; 2020 Sep; 63(9):1116-1132. PubMed ID: 32370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exploring Trust in Self-Driving Vehicles Through Text Analysis.
    Lee JD; Kolodge K
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):260-277. PubMed ID: 31502885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simple manipulations of anthropomorphism fail to induce perceptions of humanness or improve trust in an automated agent.
    Cockram L; Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Sep; 111():104027. PubMed ID: 37100010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.