These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29614070)

  • 41. Sectional neuroanatomy of the lumbosacral spine (L1-S5).
    Chiou-Tan FY; Miller JS; Zhang H; Kass JS; Taber KH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):826-9. PubMed ID: 17895800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. 3-D/2-D registration of CT and MR to X-ray images.
    Tomazevic D; Likar B; Slivnik T; Pernus F
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Nov; 22(11):1407-16. PubMed ID: 14606674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Clinical diagnostic rating (score) of the degree of lumbosacral degenerative lesion].
    Konovalov NA; Shevelev IN; Kornienko VN; Nazarenko AG
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2007; (5):16-20. PubMed ID: 18652189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
    Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
    Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Magnetic Resonance Neurography in Chronic Lumbosacral and Pelvic Pain: Diagnostic and Management Impact-Institutional Audit.
    Dessouky R; Xi Y; Scott KM; Khaleel M; Gill K; Jones S; Khalifa DN; Tantawy HI; Aidaros MA; Chhabra A
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e77-e113. PubMed ID: 29581014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Agreement between computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical findings in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis.
    Suwankong N; Voorhout G; Hazewinkel HA; Meij BP
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Dec; 229(12):1924-9. PubMed ID: 17173530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Differentiation of common large sellar-suprasellar masses effect of artificial neural network on radiologists' diagnosis performance.
    Kitajima M; Hirai T; Katsuragawa S; Okuda T; Fukuoka H; Sasao A; Akter M; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Ikeda R; Yamashita Y; Yano S; Kuratsu J; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 19201360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Consistency between physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists and a radiologist in interpretation of lumbosacral radiographs.
    Taskaynatan MA; Kızılırmak S; Balaban B; Bozlar U; Goktepe AS; Ozgul A; Tan AK
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2011; 24(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 22142707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Combination strategies in multi-atlas image segmentation: application to brain MR data.
    Artaechevarria X; Munoz-Barrutia A; Ortiz-de-Solorzano C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Aug; 28(8):1266-77. PubMed ID: 19228554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Development of a clinical workflow tool to enhance the detection of vertebral fractures: accuracy and precision evaluation.
    Brett A; Miller CG; Hayes CW; Krasnow J; Ozanian T; Abrams K; Block JE; van Kuijk C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2437-43. PubMed ID: 19829258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury of ankle: evaluation with contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state MR imaging.
    Kim S; Huh YM; Song HT; Lee SA; Lee JW; Lee JE; Chung IH; Suh JS
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):225-35. PubMed ID: 17185669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sciatica of nondisc origin and piriformis syndrome: diagnosis by magnetic resonance neurography and interventional magnetic resonance imaging with outcome study of resulting treatment.
    Filler AG; Haynes J; Jordan SE; Prager J; Villablanca JP; Farahani K; McBride DQ; Tsuruda JS; Morisoli B; Batzdorf U; Johnson JP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Feb; 2(2):99-115. PubMed ID: 15739520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Long-term functional outcome after traumatic lumbosacral dissociation. A retrospective case series of 13 patients.
    Adelved A; Tötterman A; Glott T; Hellund JC; Madsen JE; Røise O
    Injury; 2016 Jul; 47(7):1562-8. PubMed ID: 27126767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Threshold selection criteria for quantification of lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid and root volumes from MRI.
    Puigdellívol-Sánchez A; Reina MA; San-Molina J; Escobar JM; Castedo J; Prats-Galino A
    J Neuroimaging; 2015; 25(3):488-93. PubMed ID: 25060426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging--accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade.
    Takeuchi M; Sasaki S; Ito M; Okada S; Takahashi S; Kawai T; Suzuki K; Oshima H; Hara M; Shibamoto Y
    Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 19332849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Painful lumbosacral melorheostosis treated by fusion.
    Robertson PA; Don AS; Miller MV
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):E234-8. PubMed ID: 12811287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of a knowledge-based, image analysis and clinical decision support system on observer performance in the diagnosis of approximal caries from radiographic images.
    Firestone AR; Sema D; Heaven TJ; Weems RA
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 9544861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improving diagnostic accuracy: a comparison of interactive and Delphi consultations.
    Hillman BJ; Hessel SJ; Swensson RG; Herman PG
    Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 856753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Can raters consistently evaluate the content of focus groups?
    Weinberger M; Ferguson JA; Westmoreland G; Mamlin LA; Segar DS; Eckert GJ; Greene JY; Martin DK; Tierney WM
    Soc Sci Med; 1998 Apr; 46(7):929-33. PubMed ID: 9541078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.