BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2961498)

  • 1. Modern synthetic suture materials and abdominal wound closure techniques in gynaecological surgery.
    Scheidel P; Hohl MK
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Jun; 1(2):223-46. PubMed ID: 2961498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
    Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mass closure versus layer closure of abdominal wound: a prospective clinical study.
    Chowdhury SK; Choudhury SD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1994 Jul; 92(7):229-32. PubMed ID: 7963604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowl operations.
    Corman ML; Veidenheimer MC; Coller JA
    Am J Surg; 1981 Apr; 141(4):510-13. PubMed ID: 6452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis.
    Hodgson NC; Malthaner RA; Ostbye T
    Ann Surg; 2000 Mar; 231(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 10714638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chromic catgut suture should be abandoned for fascial closure of the anterior abdominal wall in favor of newer, stronger delayed absorbable suture materials. Pro.
    Aronson MP; Lee RA
    J Gynecol Surg; 1990; 6(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 10150014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Current standards of abdominal wall closure techniques : Conventional suture techniques].
    Heger P; Pianka F; Diener MK; Mihaljevic AL
    Chirurg; 2016 Sep; 87(9):737-743. PubMed ID: 27392763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suture materials currently used in obstetric-gynecologic surgery in the United States: a questionnaire survey.
    Hartko WJ; Ghanekar G; Kemmann E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Feb; 59(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 6281703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.
    Justinger C; Slotta JE; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22088813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
    Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
    Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material.
    Talpur AA; Awan MS; Surhio AR
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 24800342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Syneture stainless STEEL suture. A collective review of its performance in surgical wound closure.
    Edlich RF; Drake DB; Rodeheaver GT; Winters KL; Greene JA; Gubler KD; Long WB; Britt LD; Winters SP; Scott CC; Lin KY
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 16566749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amount of suture material needed for continuous or interrupted wound closure: an experimental study.
    Trimbos JB; van Rooij J
    Eur J Surg; 1993 Mar; 159(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 8102887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chromic catgut suture should be abandoned for fascial closure of the anterior abdominal wall in favor of newer, stronger delayed absorbable suture materials. Con.
    Roseff SJ; Breen JL
    J Gynecol Surg; 1990; 6(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 10150015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New developments in abdominal wall closure].
    Carlson MA
    Chirurg; 2000 Jul; 71(7):743-53. PubMed ID: 10986596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.
    Sah AP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2019-27. PubMed ID: 25631171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Meta-analysis of suture techniques for midline abdominal incisions].
    Jin JB; Jiang ZP; Chen S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 48(16):1256-61. PubMed ID: 21055218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.