These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2961498)

  • 41. The figure-of-8 through-and-through monofilament abdominal wound closure with wound splints: elimination of evisceration in poor-risk wounds over 25 years.
    Dennis C; Aka E
    Surgery; 1973 Feb; 73(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 4265312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Studies concerning the usefulness of catgut, PGA and polyester for abdominal fascia closure (author's transl)].
    Tauber R; Seidel W; Mees P
    Res Exp Med (Berl); 1975 Jul; 165(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 131363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Abdominal wound closure with a continuous monofilament polypropylene suture. Experience with 1,000 consecutive cases.
    Knight CD; Griffen FD
    Arch Surg; 1983 Nov; 118(11):1305-8. PubMed ID: 6357147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Adhesion formation to incisional abdominal wound in response to polyamide "6" and polyglactin "910" sutures.
    Ansari AG
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 42(8):184-5. PubMed ID: 1433796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Use of synthetic absorbable sutures for abdominal and chest wound closure. Experience with 650 consecutive cases.
    Murray DH; Blaisdell FW
    Arch Surg; 1978 Apr; 113(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 346006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Role of suture material and technique of closure in wound outcome following laparotomy for peritonitis.
    Agrawal V; Sharma N; Joshi MK; Minocha VR
    Trop Gastroenterol; 2009; 30(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 20426290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A new synthetic absorbable suture.
    Postlethwait RW; Smith BM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Mar; 140(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 123087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A randomized clinical trial comparing two methods of fascia closure following midline laparotomy.
    Trimbos JB; Smit IB; Holm JP; Hermans J
    Arch Surg; 1992 Oct; 127(10):1232-4. PubMed ID: 1417492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of the degree of abdominal adhesion formation associated with chromic catgut and polypropylene suture materials.
    Rochat MC; Lin J; Pope ER; Carson WL; Wagner-Mann CC; Pace LW
    Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):943-7. PubMed ID: 8725827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions.
    Muysoms FE; Antoniou SA; Bury K; Campanelli G; Conze J; Cuccurullo D; de Beaux AC; Deerenberg EB; East B; Fortelny RH; Gillion JF; Henriksen NA; Israelsson L; Jairam A; Jänes A; Jeekel J; López-Cano M; Miserez M; Morales-Conde S; Sanders DL; Simons MP; Śmietański M; Venclauskas L; Berrevoet F;
    Hernia; 2015 Feb; 19(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 25618025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The choice of a suture to close abdominal incisions.
    Bucknall TE; Teare L; Ellis H
    Eur Surg Res; 1983; 15(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 6303791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mass closure of the abdominal wound with delayed absorbable suture in surgery for gynecologic cancer.
    Hoffman MS; Villa A; Roberts WS; Fiorica JV; LaPolla JP; Barton DP; Cavanagh D
    J Reprod Med; 1991 May; 36(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 2061883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The relative importance of Vicryl and Prolene sutures to the strength of healing abdominal wounds.
    Nilsson T
    Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(7):503-7. PubMed ID: 6213133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Randomised prospective study of abdominal wall closure in patients with gynaecological cancer.
    Berretta R; Rolla M; Patrelli TS; Piantelli G; Merisio C; Melpignano M; Nardelli GB; Modena AB
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Aug; 50(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 20716270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Theory and practice of continuous laparotomy suture (abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia)].
    Stelzner F
    Chirurg; 1988 Oct; 59(10):654-60. PubMed ID: 2973974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature.
    Ceydeli A; Rucinski J; Wise L
    Curr Surg; 2005; 62(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 15796944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Incisional hernia after laparotomy: prospective randomized comparison between early-absorbable and late-absorbable suture materials.
    Hsiao WC; Young KC; Wang ST; Lin PW
    World J Surg; 2000 Jun; 24(6):747-51; discussion 752. PubMed ID: 10773130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds.
    Goligher JC; Irvin TT; Johnston D; De Dombal FT; Hill GL; Horrocks JC
    Br J Surg; 1975 Oct; 62(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 1104042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.
    Richards PC; Balch CM; Aldrete JS
    Ann Surg; 1983 Feb; 197(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 6297417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.