BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29615072)

  • 1. Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening and diagnosis in women with dense breasts - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Phi XA; Tagliafico A; Houssami N; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):380. PubMed ID: 29615072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tomosynthesis with synthesised two-dimensional mammography yields higher cancer detection compared to digital mammography alone, also in dense breasts and in younger women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Jänsch A; Hacker A; Weinand S; Vogelmann T
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 152():110324. PubMed ID: 35576720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
    Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts.
    Ha SM; Yi A; Yim D; Jang MJ; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Lee EJ; Lee SH; Moon WK; Chang JM
    Korean J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):274-283. PubMed ID: 36996902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An individual participant data meta-analysis of breast cancer detection and recall rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography population screening.
    Libesman S; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S; Seidler AL; Bernardi D; Lång K; Robledo KP; Houssami N
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(5):e647-e654. PubMed ID: 35246389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Jänsch A; Hacker A; Weinand S; Vogelmann T
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2301-2312. PubMed ID: 34694451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
    Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma.
    Onega T; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Lee CI; Henderson LM; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson ANA; Weaver D; Sprague BL; Bowles EJA; di Florio-Alexander RM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Dec; 202(3):505-514. PubMed ID: 37697031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
    Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
    Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alabousi M; Zha N; Salameh JP; Samoilov L; Sharifabadi AD; Pozdnyakov A; Sadeghirad B; Freitas V; McInnes MDF; Alabousi A
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):2058-2071. PubMed ID: 31900699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Resource Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Following Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Findings From a Learning Health System.
    Alsheik NH; Dabbous F; Pohlman SK; Troeger KM; Gliklich RE; Donadio GM; Su Z; Menon V; Conant EF
    Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 30057195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Synthetic Mammography, and Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Alabousi M; Wadera A; Kashif Al-Ghita M; Kashef Al-Ghetaa R; Salameh JP; Pozdnyakov A; Zha N; Samoilov L; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; Sadeghirad B; Freitas V; McInnes MD; Alabousi A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Jun; 113(6):680-690. PubMed ID: 33372954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation.
    Bernardi D; Gentilini MA; De Nisi M; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Luparia A; Houssami N
    Breast; 2020 Apr; 50():135-140. PubMed ID: 31607526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.
    Moshina N; Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Haldorsen IS; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32930649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Performance of Adjunctive Imaging Modalities Compared to Mammography Alone in Women with Non-Dense and Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hadadi I; Rae W; Clarke J; McEntee M; Ekpo E
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):278-291. PubMed ID: 33846098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Ko MJ; Park DA; Kim SH; Ko ES; Shin KH; Lim W; Kwak BS; Chang JM
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1240-1252. PubMed ID: 34047504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.