444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29615086)
1. Comparison of lateral entry with crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis.
Na Y; Bai R; Zhao Z; Han C; Kong L; Ren Y; Liu W
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 13(1):68. PubMed ID: 29615086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of lateral entry and crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao H; Xu S; Liu G; Zhao J; Wu S; Peng L
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jun; 16(1):366. PubMed ID: 34107972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The consequences of pin placement.
Skaggs DL; Hale JM; Bassett J; Kaminsky C; Kay RM; Tolo VT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 May; 83(5):735-40. PubMed ID: 11379744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lateral-entry pin fixation in the management of supracondylar fractures in children.
Skaggs DL; Cluck MW; Mostofi A; Flynn JM; Kay RM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 15069133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The posterior intrafocal pin improves sagittal alignment in Gartland type III paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.
Kao HK; Lee WC; Yang WE; Chang CH
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):842-7. PubMed ID: 26777466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after the surgical treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus: number needed to harm, a systematic review.
Slobogean BL; Jackman H; Tennant S; Slobogean GP; Mulpuri K
J Pediatr Orthop; 2010; 30(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 20574258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial-lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus.
Prashant K; Lakhotia D; Bhattacharyya TD; Mahanta AK; Ravoof A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Sep; 17(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 27312248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results of crossed versus lateral entry K-wire fixation of displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dekker AE; Krijnen P; Schipper IB
Injury; 2016 Nov; 47(11):2391-2398. PubMed ID: 27596688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of posterior intrafocal pin fixation for the pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture.
Marsland D; Belkoff SM
J Pediatr Orthop; 2014 Jan; 34(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 23812145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low incidence of ulnar nerve injury with crossed pin placement for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using a mini-open technique.
Green DW; Widmann RF; Frank JS; Gardner MJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Mar; 19(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15758668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of crossed-pin versus lateral-pin fixation in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures.
Topping RE; Blanco JS; Davis TJ
J Pediatr Orthop; 1995; 15(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 7560029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures among children: crossed versus lateral pinning.
Zamzam MM; Bakarman KA
Injury; 2009 Jun; 40(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 19394928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review of medial and lateral entry pinning versus lateral entry pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus.
Brauer CA; Lee BM; Bae DS; Waters PM; Kocher MS
J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Mar; 27(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 17314643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A randomized clinical trial.
Kocher MS; Kasser JR; Waters PM; Bae D; Snyder BD; Hresko MT; Hedequist D; Karlin L; Kim YJ; Murray MM; Millis MB; Emans JB; Dichtel L; Matheney T; Lee BM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):706-12. PubMed ID: 17403790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is lateral pin fixation for displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus better than crossed pins in children?
Zhao JG; Wang J; Zhang P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Sep; 471(9):2942-53. PubMed ID: 23653099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomised non-blinded comparison of conventional and Dorgan's crossed pins for paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.
Dučić S; Radlović V; Bukva B; Radojičić Z; Vrgoč G; Brkić I; Jaramaz Dučić T; Jurdana H; Abramović D; Bojović N; Štefan L
Injury; 2016 Nov; 47(11):2479-2483. PubMed ID: 27622613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three lateral divergent or parallel pin fixations for the treatment of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children.
Lee YH; Lee SK; Kim BS; Chung MS; Baek GH; Gong HS; Lee JK
J Pediatr Orthop; 2008 Jun; 28(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 18520276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children.
Eberl R; Eder C; Smolle E; Weinberg AM; Hoellwarth ME; Singer G
Acta Orthop; 2011 Oct; 82(5):606-9. PubMed ID: 21992087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of lateral-exit crossed-pin fixation for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a retrospective case series.
Yun YH; Kang HW; Lim C; Lee KR; Song MH
J Pediatr Orthop B; 2024 Mar; 33(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 37040658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advantages and disadvantages of the prone position in the surgical treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. A literature review.
De Pellegrin M; Fracassetti D; Moharamzadeh D; Origo C; Catena N
Injury; 2018 Nov; 49 Suppl 3():S37-S42. PubMed ID: 30286976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]