150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29616167)
1. Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study.
Negenborn VL; Dikmans REG; Bouman MB; Wilschut JA; Mullender MG; Salzberg CA
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Feb; 6(2):e1654. PubMed ID: 29616167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
Gao P; Bai P; Ren Y; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2581-2590. PubMed ID: 34350500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship of human acellular dermal matrix thickness on complication rate and patient-reported outcomes in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
Hong SE; Kim JH
Gland Surg; 2021 Jan; 10(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 33633966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Frisell J; Brandberg Y
BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 32762012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction.
Potter S; Browning D; Savović J; Holcombe C; Blazeby JM
Br J Surg; 2015 Aug; 102(9):1010-25. PubMed ID: 26109277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications after Perforated versus Nonperforated Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Wood KL; Margulies IG; Shay PL; Ashikari AY; Salzberg CA
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e2690. PubMed ID: 32537347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Passot-Type Immediate Breast Reconstruction Obviates the Use of Aceullular Dermal Matrix in Grades 2 and 3 Ptosis.
Rivet JJ; Day KM; Rau JF; Waldrop JL; Brzezienski MA
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S394-S398. PubMed ID: 30694845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (Epiflex®) in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Treatment of Capsular Fibrosis: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study.
Beier L; Faridi A; Neumann C; Paepke S; Mau C; Keller M; Strittmatter HJ; Gerber-Schäfer C; Bauer L; Karsten MM; Kümmel S; Blohmer JU
Breast Care (Basel); 2021 Oct; 16(5):461-467. PubMed ID: 34720805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: Safety Data From an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial in the Setting of Breast Cancer Treatment.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Roy PG; Johansson H; Brandberg Y; Eriksen C; Frisell J
Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 30308615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current practice and barriers of mesh-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction in China: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of 110 hospitals.
Guo R; Li L; Su Y; Xiu B; Zhang Q; Wang J; Chi W; Yang B; Zhang Y; Cao A; Shao Z; Wu J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jan; 46(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 31519428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should Acellular Dermal Matrices Be Used for Implant-based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy? Clinical Recommendation Based on the GRADE Approach.
Cinquini M; Rocco N; Catanuto G; Garreffa E; Ferrando PM; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Maglia A; Montagna G; Villanucci A; Visintini Cividin V; Nava MB
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2023 Feb; 11(2):e4821. PubMed ID: 36845868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acellular bovine pericardium matrix in immediate breast reconstruction compared with conventional implant-based breast reconstruction.
Wang S; He S; Zhang X; Sun J; Huang Q; Liu J; Han C; Yin Z; Ding B; Yin J
JPRAS Open; 2021 Sep; 29():1-9. PubMed ID: 33937472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
